Search results

It's truly unbelievable to me whenever I see a Christian who has no understanding of the New Covenant. That should be a fundamental understanding that all Christians have. Jesus established the New Covenant fully by His blood and all who belong to Him are entered into the New Covenant. The New...

No, you absolutely do not. You have no idea of what is taught in the New Testament, as evidenced by all of the things you say that contradict the teachings in the New Testament. Also, as evidenced by the fact that when I have debated you before and presented evidence to back up my claims from...

No, but there's definitely something very wrong with yours, as you've proven over and over again. Don't try to speak for me. Nothing you're saying about what I'm supposedly saying is true. I believe that Ezekiel 37 is referring to what happened here long ago and not to a future resurrection of...

Nowhere does scripture teach that a bunch of resurrected people will be roaming around on the earth for a thousand years. When the unsaved dead are resurrected, they will be resurrected to "shame and everlasting contempt" (Daniel 12:2) and to "damnation" (John 5:28-29) in the lake of fire for...

He can't do that literally, but that is not meant to be taken literally. You need to accept what the NT teaches instead of trying to change it to fit your flawed understanding of the OT. The NT clearly teaches that the entire earth will be burned up when Jesus returns (2 Peter 3:10-12).

Yes, but Paul does call that body "a spiritual body" in contrast to the "natural body" we have now (see 1 Corinthians 15:42-44). It isn't that a spiritual body can't be physical, though. Paul contrasted the spiritual body with the natural body, not the spiritual body with the physical body. The...

It doesn't make any sense to say that the saved and lost will be resurrected on the same day while also trying to claim that the thousand years will occur in the future. Who are the ones who are destroyed by fire in Revelation 20:9 in that case? People who had been resurrected? That's nonsense...

You obviously don't pay attention to the New Testament or else you wouldn't interpret Ezekiel 37-39 the way you do.

None of those scriptures say anything about anyone coming against resurrected saints. I guarantee that you can't show any scripture which says that. Where does this say that those people had been resurrected? It doesn't. Scripture teaches that the dead in Christ will all be resurrected at the...

Why don't you read my response first before you respond again? Have some patience. Read my previous post. I didn't say they would be harmed. Read more carefully. Speed reading just makes you look bad. Take your time.

I didn't say they are actually harmed. You have a reading comprehension problem. You said "Gog comes against the resurected saints who have the spirit of God in them". What I'm asking is why would anyone even try to harm people who have immortal bodies, which resurrected saints will have...

Resurrected saints will have immortal bodies. How could anyone try to harm people with immortal bodies? That's nonsense. Scripture never teaches that anyone will be resurrected with a mortal body and then will roam around on the earth after that. Once the resurrection of the dead occurs...

Wrong. It is the glorious return of Christ because at His glorious return what also will happen is the gathering of His people to Himself "in the air". Paul wrote about this event in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:9. Every person on the earth will experience one of two things on that day. Each person...

What kind of ridiculous response is this? I was not being rude to you at all and this is how you respond to me? What is wrong with you? I'm without excuse? What in the world are you even talking about? What was wrong with what I asked? It was not an unintelligent question at all. I was asking...

Yes, it does. And many does not mean not all. If I say that there are many people in the world I'm not only referring to some of the people in the world, I'm referring to all of them and their number is "many". But, keep trying to make the word mean not all if you want. That's a definition of...

I've never said otherwise. The only response you ever have is to misrepresent my view. That shows how weak your own view is. LOL. A more meaningless statement has never been uttered. There are many people in the world and I am referring to all of the people in the world. So, in that case, many...

He didn't. And I'm not talking about literally changing the words of scripture here, I'm talking about making the words written in scripture mean what you want them to mean. Such as how you try to make it as if the Hebrew word "rab" means not all to support your interpretation of Daniel 12:2...

I defer to your expertise in that area since you have so much practice. Hello? Are you reading anything I'm saying? It does not have to say ALL. As I've pointed out and as you have apparently ignored, many does not mean not all. If I say that there are many people in the world am I not...

Thanks for responding. Now, I remember that there are actually two people who manipulate scripture to make it say what they want it to say more than he does and not just one. You and the other person I had in mind.

LOL. No, you are not "deeply hurt and lost for words, astonished!". I'm pretty sure you are not that easily offended. Give me a break. You are an expert at making personal attacks and false accusations, so I don't see how you can be offended by them. LOL. What I'm asking you for evidence of is...