Search results

What's not amazing is that the Biblically illiterate believe Protestant Christianity is connected with Roman Catholicism, when the Protestant movement was about getting BACK TO GOD'S WORD DE FACTO AS WRITTEN.

So if Christ's Kingdom is established on earth 'now' through His saints, then why does our Lord Jesus need to return and gather us to Him, since that is written and is still future to us??? It's simple. It's because Christ's Kingdom today is only established in the hearts and minds of His...

If you don't understand the connection between the locusts in Rev.9 with Joel 2, then it has to mean you don't understand one or the other, instead of both like we're supposed to know. In the Joel prophecy, the locusts is given as a symbolic metaphor. In Rev.9 the locusts is given as a symbolic...

The sea of glass vision of Rev.15:2 is for after... Christ's second coming, and it's about those who reign with Him. That's about the only idea you said above that actually is Biblical.

The three angel's Messages aren't that difficult to get right in the Revelation timeline. Rev 14:6-12 6 And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people, 7...

It's already occuring, although their final working on earth is not yet, which is what you're talking about I think (per Rev.9). Look at the working of the 3rd and 4th Seals. They're about collapse of commerce, famine, etc. That's where we are today, the locusts of Joel working. They work in...

Kind of straining at a gnat aren't 'cha? The cleansing of the sanctuary idea is about the anointing of the most Holy, i.e., the most Holy Place, the Millennium temple of Ezekiel 40-47. That's why the 2300 days period of Dan.8:14 can only be discovered by its place at the end of the time, times...

You might desire to use that open mind to look at the idea of being taken and snared per the Isaiah 8 & 28 Scripture, for it is related to those Luke 17 metaphors our Lord Jesus was giving about being 'taken'. It's about being 'taken' in deception. And in deception to whom for the last days...

Yes, it is a cool connection, a history of the early Culdee Church in Britain that many within the Roman Church have tried to bury. See also about Glatonbury, where one of the very first Churches was built in early Briton. The earliest usage of the title of 'pope' was in the 3rd century A.D...

The idea of a 'pseudochristos' per Strong's is 'a spurious Messiah'. The Greek word pseudo with 'spurious' means a fake, an imposter, which is more specific than just the idea of 'false'. That's why the ones of Matt.24:5 are different from that 'pseudochristos' of Matt.24:24 coming to work...

But that idea really is Pantheism (for those who don't know what that means, it's about belief that God is 'in' everything, because He 'is' everything.) The Hebrews 11:3 verse is a counter to that. It reveals that material matter was created from the 'invisible' realm of God. It's one of...

That was Satan's spirit our Lord Jesus was rebuking, the "spirit of antichrist" idea. Demonic possession like the man at the tomb in Mark 5 was obviously different than the case of Judas. In John 6 our Lord Jesus referred to Judas as a devil though. It would suggest that Judas knew his own...

It doesn't only apply to those of God's people that will be deceived in Jerusalem, but also to Christian brethren that will be deceived by the coming false messiah. It's going to be a world-wide deception, not just in Jerusalem.

That's simply your opinion, and nothing else. My Bible translation says "desire of women" (KJV). And the word for "desire" is Hebrew chemdah, which is a feminine noun put for what is desirable. It's being used as an adjective. It fits pretty well too, since Satan himself will be that false...

The way you're interpreting the Dan.12:11 verse does cause a direct conflict with the order of events in the rest of Daniel about the end of sacrifices and setting up of the abomination of desolation. So it's not just only... about your disconnect of Dan.12:11 from the subject of Dan.12:6-8...

Does that mean you claim to be one of those "two witnesses" of Rev.11 Terry? The ONLY way the "two witnesses" subject could apply to any of us besides the two that emphatically will be killed in Jerusalem is within the two candlesticks meaning about two specific Churches that stand with those...

The evidence is in your own 'outward' Church's councils, and yes, including Augustine's visit to Britain and discovering already established bishops of Christ's Church there. Britain's early Culdee Church history pre-dates the Catholic Church history and that of a pope. Histories...

You're wrong that Daniel's 70 weeks prophecy does not include the great tribulation time our Lord Jesus mentioned. The "great tribulation" period of Matt.24 and Mark 13 IS... the tribulation period Daniel was shown in Dan.7:25 which is a direct parallel to the Rev.13:4-7 verses. Likewise with...

Too much speculation outside Holy Writ. Moreover, the antichrist is to appear in Jerusalem, not the USA and not Britain, and he's coming as a fake Christ (Messiah), trying to actually fool the whole world into thinking he is GOD. No prince in Britain nor anywhere else is going to fulfill that...

I preferred Lost In Space, had more humor and better acting in my opinion. Afterall, the idea of space alien monsters is pretty humorous. God can do what He wants in regards to His creation. Yet that's not the same subject as the idea of creating and destroying material matter of the...