Search results

The Dan.12:11 verse is part of the answer to the question raised in verse 6 about how long to the end of these wonders. Dan 12:4-13 4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased. The...

So, you DO NOT believe that Jesus of Nazareth is God The Saviour? Since you think you can become your 'own' Christ, being as perfect as Christ like you said in vain, it's understandable why you would have hard time admitting that Jesus of Nazareth is part of The Godhead, God The Saviour.

This false idea that if you're a Catholic or a Protestant means you're not a real Christian is getting old. It's a Jewish fable and that's all there is to it! It is a false doctrine of the Judaizers, the same crept in unawares in Christ's early Church in Paul's days, converts of the blind...

Not understanding how the orthodox Jews will fall away to worship the coming false messiah is a sign of deception in itself. That's why the idea that the coming Antichrist will be an Islamic figure shows deception, because even orthodox Jews would NEVER bow to an Islamic figure saying he is The...

I see some OT Scriptures like these used a lot to try and counter Scripture like Eccl.12:5-7; 1 Cor.15; Matt.10:28; 2 Cor.5, etc., which all reveal our soul and spirit have continued existence after flesh death. Most of the time those OT verses are pulled out of context. [/i] Ps 146:3-4 3...

No problems. I was just trying to make the point of how a title like "king of the Jews" was actually intended as a slur, and not actually an official title of our Lord Jesus Christ. As for the Melchisedec matter, I believe 100% that Melchisedec who met Abraham was our Lord Jesus Christ back in...

The Dan.12:11 verse is easy to get out of context if read by itself. That Dan.12:11 verse is part of the answer to the question asked back at Dan.12:8, with the question first being raised back at Dan.12:4 & 6. When a question is being presented it means to then look for the answer. So that...

Associating the attack those locusts do with military arms is leaving the text there, since 3 times we are shown that it's what comes out of their 'mouths' is where their power is. Proper interpretation will only come by keeping the flow of the chapter while not omitting any of the prophetic...

Translators have been open to bringing the Greek personal pronoun 'he, she, it, we, they' hap-hazardly into English. So you can't totally rely on that. The first beast of Rev.13:1-2 is about a kingdom, comes up out of the sea, and Christ definied it as containing multitudes, peoples, nations...

You actually ought to have a bit of an advantage by coming out of the new age stuff, because you should have a better contrast between God's Truth and the devil's lies. Per Amos 8, God said the day would come when He would bring a famine upon the land, but not one for lack of bread or thirst...

Let's try that again; this time letting God's people learn about this from God's Word: Gen 1:2 2 And the earth was without form (tohuw), and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. (KJV) Jer 4:23-26 23 I beheld the earth...

I can easily see the difference per God's Word. It's because God's Word gives us a 'specific' time for Christ's second coming within the timeline order. Sorry to say, but many today do not understand that timeline order of events per God's Word. The only reason I can see that some want to...

But that still does not prove Christ Jesus was any so-called "king of the Jews", which actually was a slur by Pilate. John 18:33-34 33 Then Pilate entered into the judgment hall again, and called Jesus, and said unto Him, "Art thou the King of the Jews?" 34 Jesus answered him, "Sayest...

It would depend on who's time reference is being used. With a secular non-Christian in John's day they would most likely assign that idea as being in their own lifetime. But the secular view often does not align to God's timelines in His Word. So Apostle John who was taught by our Lord Jesus...

I couldn't escape the Expressionist assocation with that, and I am somewhat of an artist. My first declared major in college was commercial art. Satan knows he has lost. God has showed in several places how Satan and his angels have already been judged and sentenced. It's only that his...

The 1260 days or 3.5 years period in question is the last half of Daniel's "one week", and it is the tribulation period. The 30 days and the 45 days is for after that 3.5 years (1260 days) period. The flow is 1. 1260 days; 2. 1290 days; 3. 1335 days. You're trying to move those 1290 and 1335...

Here's the way i cover Rev.9. Rev 9:1-21 1 And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star fall from heaven unto the earth: and to him was given the key of the bottomless pit. Since this "star" that falls from heaven was given a key, and it's to the bottomless pit, what is literal and what...

If you keep at that, grasping the 6th trumpet timing ought to be fairly easy. It's the 6th seal and 6th vial parts that are the most difficult to grasp, and will require recalling our Lord Jesus Olivet Discourse, and the 'thief in the night" timing.

I think they called that sky is green, grass is blue, etc., as Expressionism in modern art. Satan already knows he has lost. What he's trying to do is to get as many as he can to lose along with him. And that's the test upon the majority which our Heavenly Father allows. Not really a...

I'm not sure you're reading that Dan.12:11 verse correctly. The ending of the daily sacrifice and setting up of the abomination occurs at the same time, at the middle of the final "one week". Dan 12:7-12 7 And I heard the man clothed in linen, which was upon the waters of the river, when he...