Search results

Stop trusting in flawed human beings and put your faith in God.

WHO said we don't do that?? When somebody asks YOU to pray for them - do you ask them why they're not going to the Father through Christ - or is that judgment only reserved for Catholics?? Not only is there NOTHING wrong with asking people to pray for you - we are ENCOURAGED in the Bible to...

WRONG. I've already proven - quite amply, I might add - that asking the saints to pray for us doe NOT fall under the definition of "Necromancy". Only an ignorant or dishonest person would think that in light of the overwhelming evidence I've presented.. Sooooo - you believe that those in Heaven...

I would answer it like this: There are literally hundreds of prophecies about Jesus in the old Testament that He fulfilled. He couldn't have consciously fulfilled them all if he were a mere human being because some of them had to do with how He was conceived and how He was born. Secondly -...

I don't have to. Van Impe is ALREADY a false prophet by his many past false prophecies. All is takes is ONE false prophecy to make a FALSE Prophet.

This is really an anti-Biblical statement. - Was James "wrong" for telling his readers to prayerfully intercede for one another (James 5:16)? - Do you think Paul was "wrong" for asking his readers for prayerful intercession (1 Tim. 2:1)? - Was John "wrong" for telling his readers to pray for...

No - the word "Baptism" isn't defined in the NT - and neither is "Adeplhos". The Bible isn't a dictionary. That's where the study of linguistics comes into play.

No, you didn't. Otherwise - you would have seen just how woefully-wrong you were.

We don't "earn" our salvation. We simply understand that TRUE faith = Belief + Obedience (works). You cannot have true faith without either component . . .

You can rave on ALL day long about how "scared" the Protestant Rebels were regarding the invention of new theology - but the truth speaks for itself. The flurry of man-made doctrines during this time completely negates your claim that they were simply too "afraid" to part with Catholic teaching...

Ummmmm, that's NOT what the Pope said, my dishonest, Catholic-hating SDA cultist friend. First of all - he was talking about CATHOLICS when he said the following: “One must point out the defects in order to correct them, but when one reports the defects, denounces them, one must love the Church...

No - it's not a "justification" of anything. It's an exposing of yet another angry little anti-Catholic's moronic rubbish. It could have been a picture of the Pope taking a nap - and YOU would have painted a picture of something FAR more "sinister" because that's what you do. That's what SDA...

And I told you that the Protestant Fathers wouldn't have cared. They were piling up one heretical teaching on top of another and it didn't faze them - so your argument goes OUT the window . . . I just gave you TWO examples. As I keep saying - denial is NOT a valid argument. Unless you can...

And that's what I get for trying to reason with an ignorant anti-Catholic by using the first online dictionary I could find. Here is the definition from a more trusted and respected source - Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary: necromancy noun nec·ro·man·cy | \ ˈne-krə-ˌman(t)-sē \...

The fact that YOU decree the Catholic faith to be a "false" religion is as irrelevant as your false prophet foiundress Ellen G. White calling the Pope the "Antichrist". False prophets don't get to be accusers . . .

And this is yet another STUPID observation. For starters - it is an incomplete picture because there are MORE bishops who fall outside of the frame. Secondly - the two in the back are not even Bishops but altar servers. Finally - unless there are only four and they are a lion, an ox, a man...

Do you have a reading problem?? Communicating with the dead "in order to gain information about the future" is the definition of necromancy. Asking those in Heaven to pray for us is NOT necromancy. NOT that difficult to differentiate . . .

STUPID answer. They weren't "afraid" of the Church - and that's why they left and began inventing doctrines like Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide, Limited Atonement, Double Predestination, Irresistible Grace and other heresies. What makes you think that they were "afraid" of inventing another...

Spoken like a typically dishonest and angry SDA. A cult that was started by false prophets William Miller & Ellen G. White - yet you have the audacity to point fingers and ANYBODY else?? All it takes is ONE failed prophec to make a false prophet - and your cult's leaders have them in SPADES...

Sooooooo - you want us to believe that Patrick WASN'T born around 387 AD because YOU say so?? And YOU say that MY sources are wrong and YOURS are right based o YOUR opinions of them?? What an asinine argument laced with your usual SDA arrogance . . .