Search results

I know what you said, Straw Man King. You're not even addressing what I said. The rest of the dead do NOT include believers. Hello? They are contrasted with dead believers who have had part in the first resurrection. Why did Paul not include those who would die during a supposed future...

So, what translation do you use? Is this a hard question? What's lively is what the stones represent and they represent Christians who are in the church. It talks about them being built into a spiritual house which matches Paul's description of the church in Ephesians 2:19-22 where he talks...

Right. So, he's trying to find any excuse he can to avoid answering those questions, including trying to make us out to be the bad guys despite him falsely accusing us of being the same person just because he can't imagine two people agreeing on things since no one agrees with him about...

I'll call you "Strawmanofthemystery". Or "Stewardofthestrawman". Which do you prefer?

How can you know if something you don't understand is false or not? That's ridiculous reasoning. You can't refute what you don't even understand.

The rest of the dead are contrasted with the dead believers who have part in the first resurrection, so they are unbelievers. Tell me where Paul indicated that any believers will be bodily resurrected at any other time besides at the second coming of Christ. I can't seem to find that here where...

You're so clever, Straw Man Supreme. This is how I picture you:

LOL. True. He's definitely running out of people to talk to who aren't on his ignore list. I wonder if he even wonders if maybe he is the problem instead of all the people on his ignore list? Probably not.

LOL. Kind of pointless for him to put you on his ignore list when he still reads your posts, anyway, right? LOL

Instead of apologizing to him and to me for your nonsense like an adult, you run away with your tail between your legs like a coward. You're totally in the wrong here, but you try to blame us for it. Unbelievable. I hope you know that no one here takes you seriously.

I'm sure he's devastated to hear about that.

Yes, that's me. You know we've talked on this forum here several times already, right? But, sure, nice to meet you again here.

Oh no. How can I recover from this? LOL.

It's very different from that as I don't have any of the seals, trumpets or vials going out of order like he does. there are clearly parallels in the book of Revelation and it is clearly not all in chronological order. To Deny that requires paying no attention to the details i nthe book. Your...

Yes, the last day of this temporal age. The age to come is eternal, according to Jesus who said it will result in "eternal life" and "life everlasting". But, not according to you.

Tell me what Bible translation you believe is trustworthy that I should be using then. Why don't you just show me what you think the difference is between 1 Peter 2 and Ephesians 2:19-22 instead of asking questions? Stop playing games. LOL. Please stop the clown act. I have destroyed your...

Again, as I said before, the foundation of our doctrine should be on clear, straightforward scripture. We can use that, along with help from the Holy Spirit, to understand more difficult passages. Do you disagree with that approach? Do you think we don't ever need any help from the Holy Spirit...

LOL. The next time you back up your claims with a coherent argument using scripture will be the first time.

Is this a serious question? Do you actually read scripture at all or not? I think not. 2 Thessalonians 1:7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, 8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that...

Just one last thing since you said this. I'm laughing at you, too. Just to be clear. In case you were wondering. <infinite smiles>