Search results

While Full immersion Baptism was the preferred method of Baptism in the Early Church, Scripture is completely SILENT on this matter. There is not ONE verse that describes an actual Baptism. We learn about the details of Baptism from Apostolic Tradition. According to the First Century...

And once again – YHVH doesn’t mean “Father” – so it san apply to the Father, the Son AND the Holy Spirit. John 8:56-59 Your father Abraham rejoiced at the thought of seeing my day; he saw it and was glad.” “You are not yet fifty years old,” they said to him, “and you have seen Abraham!” “Very...

Did YOU include the child raping going on in YOUR cult that I exposed back in Post #590??

What's the matter?? Didn't you know this about your cult?? The truth hurts - doesn't it?

Yes - it CERTAINLY is . . . Cops Accuse Christian Commune of Abusing and Raping Children

So, you won't answer because you have NO educated response. That's what I thought. Consider yourself exposed - AND Scripturally-spanked . . .

I will ask you ONE more time to explain yourself because you are dodging my question. It's really quite simple. EXPLAIN why you disagree with the verses I gave you to support the Catholic position regarding the THREE types of priesthood on the NT. This isn't rocket science, Dave. If you have...

I asked you to be specific about the Scriptural evidence I gave you regarding the 3 types of priesthood in the NT. Which verses do you have a problem with - and WHY?? CAN you do that - or are you simply incapable??

They absolutely exist - and I gave you Scriptural support. What do you have to say to the Scriptural support I gave you? Be specific - and don't simply deny it . . .

SHOW me how I am "replacing" the NT Covenant with the Old, Einstein.

You are SUPPOSED to use the OT to prove the NT. That's what the Bereans did - and they were called "Noble-minded" for doing that (Acts 17:11). You are totally ignorant of the Scriptures . . .

Which shows that YOU don't understand Scripture. ALL NT fulfillments have an OT TYPE - without exception.

Absolutely. HOWEVER . . . In the Old Testament, there were three levels of Priests: 1. Aaron, the High Priest 2. The Levitical/Ministerial Priesthood 3. The rest of the people were a general priesthood of believers. In the New Testament, there are also three levels of Priests: 1. Jesus, our...

Try posts 141, 181, 189, 209, 211, and 215, for starters. ALL of them are LOADED with Scriptural support for a ministerial Priesthood. Denial is NOT a valid argument - no matter how many times you do it . . .

No matter HOW many times you repeat this lie – it’ll still be a lie. I have shown you verse after verse of Scriptural support for the ministerial priesthood, yet you refuse to acknowledge it. Here are some more . . . James 6:14-15 Is anyone among you sick? He should SUMMON THE PRESBYTERS...

Once again – you keep equating Christ with your online cult at “aggressivechristianity.net”. They are not Christ – they are antichrist. That fact that YOU don’t know the difference speaks VOLUMES . . .

Did you even READ what I posted?? Here is it again . . . EVERY SINGLE OT Type has an NT Fulfillment – without exception. OT TYPE In the Old Testament, there were three levels of Priests: 1. Aaron, the High Priest 2. The Levitical/Ministerial Priesthood 3. The rest of the people were a general...

No - this is a debate. YOU need to show me where.

I have repeatedly destroyed this idiotic claim – just as I did in my LAST post, where I PROVED a clergy-laity distinction from a passage that YOU supplied (1 Pet. 5:1-3). As for the priesthood of ALL believers – I destroyed that, too – TWICE. Let’s make it an even THREE . . . EVERY SINGLE OT...

YHVH has NO perfect English translation. It DOESN'T mean "Father" - so it CAN apply to ALL THREE Persons of the Trinity. The Triune Godhead was not revealed in the Old Covenant. He was revealed by Christ. As for the term "The Lord's Day" - EVERY major English translation of The Didache used...