Search results

Agreed. Could is a word of potential, not actual. The words are present tense.

Your IDOLATRY is so complete that you deny the literal words of God. Paul indeed said I am the chieft sinner (present tense). Your whole doctrine depends on pretending he meant past tense. I would agree with you IF it weren't for the many verses that say otherwise, including if this verse read...

Not an answer to my question. For some reason, you deny that a man once rescued from a life threatening situation can never be in a life threatening situation again. At base, you are a mystic. The words "born again" carry mystical properties for you, which cause you to deny the many Scripture...

Do you think this applies to those who reject Christ?

You preach milk and think it meat - DELIBERATELY leaving out that once saved does not mean sanctification is complete.

Evidence your position is flawed is that you keep changing the subject. No one said to confess to a congregation but to one another. Two examples: my friend and my wife. Both devout. Both admitting sinning. My friend has an online addiction. Admitting it to people he trusts helps him repent...

No. I’m saying the writer used sin as the word in question and you are invoking a False Alternative to support your never ending OSAS doctrine.

I suggest you attempt to qualify the listener. Don't throw Pearls before swine. If you are frustrated, maybe that is God's way of telling you he does not want you on this path for his burden is light and his yoke is easy.

Right. He said present tense. Not a claim to deity. He did not say in the past we WAS the chief sinner. But we all know your doctrine is way more important than something as petty as the actual word of God. Heretics. Is that your new favorite word? If anything, you are the heretic because...

A little short of we are unable to sin.

1st, I'm not Johann. 2nd, are you truly holding the most inaccurate Bible translation in English as the standard? 3rd, are you truly pretending "faults" mean something different from sins? 4th, putting aside all your dodging, you did not answer the question of why the Bible says to confess...

I assume you are referring to after his conversion on the road to Damascus. Certainly, Paul confessed to being the chief sinner AND his verb tense is present tense, not past tense. So, there is that.

Agreed. He is making an implied Appeal to Authority, claiming that you lack any authority from men to proclaim what you do. Common tactic among RCC.

I thought this was already covered. The Bible says to confess your sins to one another (fellow believers). Why would this be in Scripture to confess our sins to one another if we did not continue to sin?

Hmmm. To echp what @marks said, this post implies that you might just be the keeper of genuine knowledge, whose mission is to fix fellow man's error in understanding. There is so much IDOLATRY in Christianity, regarding knowledge in general and doctrines in particular. Fortunately, is not much...

I'd like to watch the whole video. Many times politicians invoke a rhetorical device pretending to make the opponents argument. So, while he said this, it may have been for the purpose of putting these words into his opponents mouth. Not that I trust this anti-christ one little bit. Like Slick...

Ouch! Pharisee come lately. It’s not that anyone disagrees with God but the men who make up doctrines. See the difference?

Yes, Genesis IS talking about Creation. A more scientific term might be universe, all that exists, of which God is a part. However, as @APAK tried to explain, God exists outside his Creation also. It's difficult for us material mortals to comprehend an existence that is outside the physical...

No. Sorry. You want to take verses that apply to those who do the will of Jesus’ God AS EQUAL to those people who don’t. You’re ridiculous.

It's not what Scriptures but the OSAS doctrine you had on your mind. Otherwise, you would have invoked the non-existent OSAS verse.