Search results

That’s just it. NOTHING is “credible” enough for you when it comes to debunking Hislop’s lies and fairy tales. Instead of addressing the LIES themselves – you try to discredit the scholar who is writing about them. Try addressing the POINTS below: Ralph Woodrow 1.) While seeking to condemn...

The Bible doesn't contradict itself - no matter HOW desperately YOU try . . .

I ALREADY gave you several Protestant sources on the definition of Epignosis, INCLUDING Strong's. Pay special attention to the ones in RED . . . EPIGNOSIS Vine's Greek New Testment Dictionary C2. Know, Known, Knowledge, Unknown [Noun] epignosis akin to epiginosko, denotes "exact or full...

Cherry-picking Scripture as YOU do NEVER works. People like YOU are the reason that atheists often claim that the Bible contradicts itself. Let me assure you and them – it DOESN’T. For example – OSAS adherents are fond of cherry-picking Rom. 10:13, which says , “Everyone who calls on the name...

Not at all. Just being obedient. Your being DISobedient will get you nowhere . . .

In other words, it doesn't matter WHO debunks Hislop - as long as gullible people like you and Enoch111 can keep his manure from falling through the cracks of credibe scholarship. You are TEXTBOOK examples of ignorant anti-Catholicism . . .

From the same Wikipedia article: Critics dismissed Hislop's speculations as based on misunderstandings.[38][39] Lester L. Grabbe has claimed Hislop's argument, particularly his association of Ninus with Nimrod, is based on a misunderstanding of historical Babylon and its religion.[38] Grabbe...

He was a hack and his shoddy "history" ia laughable. He has been debunked by many credible scholars - as I have shown . . .

SOMEBODY forgot to tell Hislop . . . From Wikipedia: The book The Two Babylons (1853), by the Christian minister Alexander Hislop, was particularly influential in characterizing of Semiramis as associated with the Whore of Babylon despite a lack of supporting evidence in the Bible.[11] Hislop...

That's N That's NOT what the Bible says (Rom. 11:22, Heb. 10:26-27, 2 Peter 2:20-22, 2 Peter 3:17, Rev. 3:5, Rev. 22:19). Even people with an EPIGNOSIS of Christ can fall away and be LOST.

Nonsense – nobody can work for it. If you’re working for it – then you’ll be disappointed . . . Like I said before – I couldn’t have said it better than Matt. 7:21. Those of you who simply “call” on the name of Christ because you took Rom. 10:13 completely OUT of context - and refused to be...

You’re doing it AGAIN. You have completely IGNORED the reality of EPIGNOSIS in the verses I presented. As I showed you earlier - and in several posts – EPINOSIS in these verses in NOT simply a “mental assent” as you erroneously posit. It is a FULL, experiential and RELATIONAL knowledge – like...

Hislop was NOT simply a “messenger”. His steaming pile of manure, “The Two Babylons”, is filled with HIS theories and HIS conclusions about the origins of the Catholic Church. HIS amalgamations of different beliefs and theories led him to write the filthy LIE that Nimrod and Semiramis were...

Again with the cherry-picking - and again with the perverted doctrine of OSAS. Cherry-picking Scripture OUT of context is NEVER a good idea . . . The Scriptures assure us that we as Christians are ALREADY SAVED (Rom. 5:1, 8:24, Eph. 2:5–8) This is Initial Salvation – God give us the initial...

No - you NEVER address EPIGJNOSIS in these passages. That is your Achilles Heel.

Thanks for PROVING my point. Jesus paid for EVERYBODY - not just a few elect people. And thanks AGAIN for proving my point. Salvation is NOT for those who simply "call upon" the name of Christ. It is for those who DO THE WILL of the Father. "Calling" on His name is a good FIRST step...

No - you're missing the point. Bede made a mistake. Hislop wrote an entire book FILLED with errors and inventions of his OWN making. In other words - LIES. 2+2 = 5 is a mistake. 2+5 = the Catholic Church is pagan because I claim that a person from one century married someone from another...

Come back when you wanna have a grown-up debate - where you actually produce EVIDENCE for the things you claim. I'll go ahead and claim victory by default . . .

They are not MY works - but works prepared FOR me to do by GOD. I don't take credit for them. I simply cooperate with His grace to perform them.

And this list of MY posts proves WHAT, exactly??