Search results

That has YET to happen . . .

Nice try . . .

Then your "gold, silver and bronze" statement is a LIE because the following insurance report states that the annual numbers are MUCH higher among Protestants than that report about Catholics in Pennsylvania . . . Report: Protestant Church Insurers Handle 260 Sex Abuse Cases a Year

WRONG again. Thanks for highlighting your complete ignorance about ALL things Catholic . . . When a Pope speaks ex cathedra - that is teaching about faith and morals that is binding on Catholics, he is infallible. A Pope is NOT infallible when it comes to his own opinions.

No - I don't defend ANY guilty priest - whether he was involved in the abuse OR the cover-up. What I AM against is the complete hypocrisy of ant-Catholics who point fingers at the Catholic Church for this abomination - while IGNORING it in their OWN back yards. Your children are being violated...

Strong's spelled it out in the link YOU provided. Where do you think I got the Greek spelling?? Whether they "address" it is neither here nor there. Strong's in merely ONE of MANY Lexicons and concordances.

No - I won't allow myself to "think" that I can usurp Scripture like you guys have.

ABSOLUTELY. Excommunication is a disciplinary action - NOT a curse, as many anti-Catholics like to portray it. As for your first comments in RED - Jesus built ONE Church. He prayed fervently for that ONE Church to remain as ONE - as He and the Father are ONE (John 17:20-23). He DIDN'T build...

Sooooo, one day, YOU decided what was "authentic" and published your OWN Bible? Perspecuity is a false, man-made doctrine of John Calvin.

Not at all. If you bother to open your eyes - you will see that the 2 words are different.

Here's another question for you: WHO told you what the Canon of Scripture was? WHEN was it officially declared? I am adding these questins to the previous ones: WHO told you that the 7 Deuterocanonical Books were uninspired, "apocryphal" works? WHO rejected them? WHEN were they rejected? These...

Since you can't sem to articulate ANY points in this one-sided debate - I will gladly destroy your false notions about the history of the Canon . . . During a period of 37 years at the end of the 4th and the turn of the 5th century, the Canon of Scripture was formally declared and confirmed...

Question: WHO told you that the 7 Deuterocanonical Books were uninspired, "apocryphal" works? WHO rejected them? WHEN were they rejected?

No - RIGHT. The word used in YOUR link is: kecaritwmevnh, which is "Kecharitomene." The ROOT WORD is caritovw, which is "Charitoo." Kecharitomene is the word Luke used in his Gospel.

SURE I have - and I even gave you TWENTY-FOUR Protestant scholars who agree.

Because it's not "new" news. They've been part of the Christian Canon for some 1600 years and were part of the OPEN Jewish Canon before and during the life of Christ. Oh, by the way - EVERY year when I watch the news about the start of Hanukkah - I think of 1 Maccabees 4:6-59 . . .

Actually - the 7 Deuteroocanonical Books that were deleted in the POST-Christ. POST-Temple canon that you Protestants adhere to were ALWAYS a part of the OT Canon. They were part of the OPEN Jewish Canon that existed before and during the life of Christ and the apostles. They weren't thrown...

Well - first of all - you're basing your views on Catholic doctrine on the response of an uncatechized and ignorant Catholic. NOT wise - OR honest. Allow me to correct you AND your friend - because the Immaculate Conception IS Scriptural. As in MANY instances in Scripture - this is another...

What's wrong with you?? I presented them as examples of DISSIDENTS - not faithful Catholics. WHO said they're in "good standing"?? Why are you so dishonest??

There's your first mistake "I think". Do some research instead and you'll see that you're wrong . . .