Search results

I listed them to show you that it's not just Catholics who teach this. Now the onus is on YOU to disprove them.

And yet you STILL haven't been able to show us WERE the term "Roman Catholic Church" is an official name of the Church. You can't because it isn't - and all of your whining can't change that . . .

I NEVER claimed that they were "reliable". I simply listed their quotes as evidence of Protestant scholars agreeing with the Catholic position on Matt. 16:18. YOU denigrated them as unreliable "liberals" - yet you FAILED to illustrate why . . .

Sooooo, you DIDN'T make the following statement in post #234?? "... the Papacy would win Gold, Silver, and Bronze if child sexual abuse were and Olympic event, the problem in Protestantism doesn't even begin to approach the same severity."

And YOU fail to understand that ALL 20 Rites are in full communion with the Bishop of Rome. That DOESN'T make them "Roman", however, but only in the familial sense. This kind of inclusive language is akin to stating "ALL Americans" celebrate Independence Day - when there are legal residents...

No - you didn't. YOU stated that ALL of the TWENTY FOUR Protestant scholars I presented were unreliable - yet you only spoke ill of ONE. The onus is on YOU to bring evidence against ALL 24 of them to illustrate why their comments on Matt. 16:18 are incorrect. If you CAN'T do that - then you've...

Read Matt. 18:15-18. Jesus tells the Apostles to excommunicate people who disobey His CHURCH. Rejecting Catholic dogma IS rejecting Biblical doctrine . . .

And if YOU only had the evidence to back up YOUR idiotic notion that most priests are sex perverts. Funny how defensive you anti-Catholics become when the accusations are coming YOUR way . . .

Another LIE. I haven't asked ANYBODY to "blindly" accept anything I've said. In fact - I have challenged ALL of you to do your homework and challenge ME with competing sources. So far - you guys have FAILED. I wonder WHY that is . . .

Not sure WHERE you are getting your information - but what started out as a charitable conversation has now become a full-on anti-Catholic assault. AGAIN - we were NOT discussing infallibility. We were discussing Peter being the "Rock" of Matt. 16:18 - which YOU are trying to derail because...

And, as I've already shown you - the language of the original text doesn't say ANYTHING about "killing" or "exterminating" lives. It is rendered as "expel", "banish" or "excommunicate". As for expelling or excommunicating heretics - this is a BIBLICAL prescription - NOT an "evil Catholic"...

Uhhh, no - YOU look into them and tell ME why they are "unreliable." YOU'RE the one who made the asinine charge against them - NOT me . . . Hasn't anybody ever taught you the basic rules of debating??

And the point I have made repeatedly is that the the official name of the Catholic Church is "The Catholic Church" and NOT the "Roman Catholic" Church as you erroneously claim. Let me explain this to you one more time - and maybe it'll sink in - but I'm NOT holding my breath . . . There are...

None at ALL. I'm defending the 98.5% of the priests who have NEVER been accused of this abomination. Is there any reason YOU are denying the up to 38% of the sex perverts in your OWN Protestant sects??

WOW - another lie. What a surprise . . . There are MANY Catholic dissenters who are not excommunicated. They're commonly known as "Cafeteria Catholics". You guys REALLY need to do your homework before you go around making these sorts of embarrassing claims . . .

I would never call the Clintons "idiots". "Evil", yes - but not idiots. I gave you scholarly testimonies about Peter being the Rock from TWENTY FOUR Protestant scholars. YOU called that ALL a bunch of "liberals" - and all you can point to is D.A. Carson?? SERIOUSLY??

First of all - Peter's infallibility was NEVER the issue in this debate. It was Peter's PRIMACY over the others and whether he is the "Rock" of Matt. 16:18. Now, YOU want to move the goal posts because you're losing this argument. Papal Infallibility is a completely different issue - and I...

Can you see my point? There is NO consensus among Protestants regarding Peter being the Rock of Matt. 16:18 - yet YOU and CoreIssue and other anti-Catholics here are insisting that he is NOT based on the testimonies of a few Protestant scholars. ALL Catholic scholars and MANY Protestant...

Give me the names of the "liberals" and explain WHY they're liberal and NOT credible. CAN yo do that?? I didn't think so . . . MOST of them hold degrees in Theology, Linguistics and Archaeology.

And AGAIN - you give me ONE and I gave you TWENTY FOUR scholars - ALL Protestant. The difference is that I gave you PROTESTANT Scholars who agree with the Catholic position on Peter. YOU give me a single Protestant scholar. No big surprise there . . . When you can produce a few more -...