Search results

We Christians believe that God spoke and the entire universe leapt into existence. Turning a piece of bread into His flesh is a relatively small miracle by comparison. YOUR lack of faith is pathetic . . .

Never called ANYBODY a "liar" in all the years I've been here . . .

Ummmm, I already pointed out to you that YOU yourself condemned GG for supporting Rollo when he stated that the K of C has “killed millions” of people. I don’t need to prove ANYTHING else to you because this is evidenceenough that she spreads hatred of the Catholic Church by supporting this...

Matt. 16:16 Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned. John 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. Doesn't get ANY clearer than that.

WRONG. Jesus said that UNLESS you are baptized you are NOT saved (Mark 16:16) and cannot enter the Kingdom of Heaven (John 3:5). Regarding the Eucharist - which Jesus FIRMLY stated was His Body and Blood (John 6:55) - He said that UNLESS you consume it - you nave NO LIFE within you...

Funny - the sources I see don't refer to Roman Catholic "Religion" but "Church". They also use the term "Roman Church", "Church in Rome" and "Catholic Church".

I've already discussed this matter in GREAT detail with him but he is firmly-rooted in his anti-Catholicism and won't listen to linguistic or historical fact. Some people prefer the lie because it fits better with their biases . . .

"The Catholic Church." This is the official name of the Catholic Church. As I have stated on NUMEROUS occasions - "Roman" or "Latin" simply refers to the RITE - of which there are TWENTY that comprise the Catholic Church. Some of the other Rites include the Melkite, Byzantine, Coptic...

And since YOU say that the use of Water in Baptism is the same as the use of bread and wine in confecting the Eucharist - then it IS necessary. In the Bread of Life Discourse in John 6 - Jesus relegates the Eucharist to a SALVIFIC role. At the Last Supper - He shows us HOW to confect the...

It's been in discussion for the last several posts. It details the false idea that Baptists can trace their denomination al the way back to the Apostles. This is simply NOT true. It was yet another denomination born in the so-called "Reformation".

No they don't - they're NOT that stupid. Only an ignorant person would call the Catholic Church the "RCC" or "Roman Catholic Church" . . .

And if you were a Baptist - chances are that YOUR sect DIDN'T adhere to the falsehood that is chronicled in Trail of Blood . . .

No - it just makes YOU a bad comic.

This "RCC" is a figment of your own imagination. There is NO such thing as the "RCC".

MOST Baptists belong to mainline Baptist denominations. The idea that the Baptists can be traced all the way back to he Apostles is NOT a belief shared by most mainline Baptists. This is a relatively NEW invention. MOST acknowledge their origins only go back as far as John Smyth in the early...

Why would you make that moronic distinction?? I was simply addressing the anti-Catholic lies. ALL of the lies being told here are wrong.

The Water is a necessary element of Baptism - just as bread and wine are necessary elements for the Eucharist. It was CHRIST who stated that we must be born of Water and Spirit. That didn't come from ME or anybody else . . .

The numbers estimated during the Medieval times were about 30-50 million - and not much higher in the Middle Ages (wikipedia). In order for an intelligent, open-minded person to truly understand history - one would need to take EVERYTHING into consideration. They would need to REMEMBER that...

There haven't been "Billions" of Knights of Columbus in their short 130 year history, Einstein. Your posts are as historically-bankrupt as they are stupid . . .

Ummmm, St. Patrick was SENT to Ireland by Pope St. Celestine I. I know that historically-bankrupt anti-Catholics like yourself like to paint a picture pof Patrick asa a "lone maverick" who spread the Gospel on his own - but he was sent by "ROME". STUDY your history . . . As for your statement...