Search results

Here is where special definitions are sought. One can testify in court for themselves but a witness, like a mediator, must necessarily be a 3rd party.

LOL The subject of this this is about JW not Apostles. Funny how you tried to call me out for you changing the subject. :-) LOL The Jehovah Witnesses name makes it clear who the passage refers to, Jehovah. But you are doing what you accuse me of; changing the subject to who the passage refers...

But isn't Jesus THE Witness - the TRUE Witness of Jehovah in Rev 3:14? If not please explain the verse?

Forum activity is a business measure of success. A self-interested forum should be aligned with encouraging increasing forum activity. (I stopped participating in other forums that had little going on.) Although I do not have access to all the behind the scene data analytics, from my...

1st, I want to express my gratitude to the The Christianity Board Moderating Team and staff, in general, for all the effort to improve CyB. A lot of changes have been made in ownership, software architecture, advertising and a lot of grace regarding passionate discussion and disputed topics...

This is why I started the thread Other Dream Supreme Court Over-Rules? Calling it the "Apple Pie, the Flag & Motherhood" Bill - that no one patriotic can oppose - but its contents are hideous has been a great tool of deception on the American people. Pork spending is another means by which...

Agreed. Agency.

We both realize it is a linguistic attempt to escape their guilt for sinning. The absurdity is extrapolating ‘being born’ to escape the guilt for all sin. Why is this sexual sin excused but not other sin? There is no reason. It’s a pathway of the Adversary. Just another linguistic attempt to...

Where did the 1st homosexual learn it from?

I think we are saying the same. One may be born feeling attracted or tempted to one sin over another. However, it seems you are not recognizing the subtle abuse of language of the enemy. Regardless of how one feels or when such emotions emerged (from birth or later), it is NOT the emotion but...

Logic dictates the one making the positive claim have the burden of proof. The fact that the trinity - the word or doctrine - is not in the Bible is an unrecoverable fact. The trinity ‘could be’ right but not because of anything God said. So, there is that!

Rev 3:14 is devastating to trinitarian dogma. No wonder I haven’t seen any reply. Just ignore what does not support (which is the vast majority of Scripture). A "mike drop moment" Another "mike drop moment" Another "mike drop moment". You are on such a roll!

Saw this and thought of you @Romanov2488. Hope it helps.

@marks, Nothing is more profound than people displaying the limits of their responsibility - by literally not responding. @Matthias asked you. 1. about the saviors Yahweh sent. And I asked you Three questions. We've asked you these 3 questions multiple times. Here is a 4th; why do you...

What you said does not follow from the text since there is no innocence. I've observed the feminization of our society has equated feelings/emotions with actions and facts. They are not equal! "Being" gay is a reprehensible expression that falsely implies an innocent crime since there is no...

We are all born broken in some way, eh?

Contradictions are not a mystery.

But this thread is not about that. This thread is to counter the Strawman that believers go on "blind" faith. My pastor says we Christians have the benefit of lived experience. This gives us such an advantage over atheists, who have merely an argument, and a blind argument at that.

Agency exists. If a captain orders his men to rescue you, a drowning man. Who is your savior; the man who pulls you out of the water or the captain who sent him?

Nothing about Jesus. I good example of God's agency though. How does God save? Through his agent. I just referenced a bunch of them. Funny how trinitarians can read into text to support their doctrine but it escapes them that 1,000's of verses imply Jesus is not God GIVEN the mutual exclusivity...