Search results

Except that it is totally absent. There is only one God - who we relate to as our Father - that is deeply present in Scripture.

Thank you. They still subscrive to mystical dualism under a different name. Oneness, is it?

The opposite is true. There is no hole in my argument whatsoever. That the Apostles nor Jesus taught the trinity should mean something to you. The trinity is not in the Bible. The obvious reason is the authors did not believe in the trinity. All the authors of the Bible, except possibly Luke...

That 1 <>1 but 2 or 3 or 7 or all.

Still struggling with figurative language usage, I see.

Of course! They reject logic. Only someone who rejects definitions and logic would suppose that a son did not come after his father.

What you claim is illogical isn’t. This is illogical, supposing God sits on his own right hand.

I’m doing nothing of the kind. I’m recognizing God’s limits. We’ve been over this before. Not long ago RichR noted 5 things that God cannot do, using Scripture to support each one.

Was Jesus telling the truth that he knows less than God?

So claims the person who denies logic. The idea that God is not logical is absurd. The only reason there is such a thing as scientific and technological progress is BECAUSE God made a logical universe that we can understand, e.g., day, night, season, plant growth, nutritional requirements...

Only the Father is God according to Scripture. Are you saying what Jesus said is untrue, that he really does know when the hour will come?

Oh the desperation to make this personal. That you deny being the son of God necessarily means he is not God, shows you reject logic. It has nothing to do with me.

Indeed, I did read the article. Predictably, my interpretation, my take away is vastly different than yours. Math is not subjective and neither is epistemology, specifically axiomatic analysis. As my logic professor pointed out, math works because logic works. And you reject logic on this topic.

I’m the one who provided requested Scripture.

I think you know that is not what I’m saying at all. You do realize the Bible is a highly figurative book, right? Do you believe Peter is Satan because Jesus called him Satan?

Peter was speaking figuratively about the context of the conversation but was literally wrong since Jesus confessed knowing less than God. Mark 13:32. Matthew 24:36.

It is not your exclamation but Thomas’. You ought to be educated enough to not merely believe but know an exclamation is not a statement of fact. When people see a horrible car crash and they exclaim, ‘Oh my God!’ They are not literally claiming the person in the car accident is the Creator of...

As has been explained to you repeatedly Hezekiah is the child in Isaiah 9:6. He is the son of the king Ahaz, living at the time of the prophet Isaiah, 7 centuries before Christ. Isaiah 9:6 is a Mistranslation | The Doctrine of the Trinity Examined

No. Jesus said God knows more than he does. So, Jesus admitted NOT being God when he admitted to knowing less than God.

If the shoe fits … The genus of folks with your beliefs exist. I merely properly identified what that is. In your world view, logic does not apply to the subject under discussion, specifically the principle of mutual exclusivity. My short hand for this is mystical dualism. And I’ve explained...