Search results

No Scripture says that. On the other hand Scripture tells us over and over and over again that Jesus is not God but of God - servant, son, lamb, word of God. If Jesus were God, there would be no verses that juxtapose God with Jesus but there are many, e.g., Acts 2:36 God made Jesus both Lord...

Seems you embrace the concept. (And I didn't ask if you reject the term) If Jesus was born 100% God, why did God's spirit descend on him when he was baptized?

Not only is this nowhere in Scripture, it contradicts Judeo-Christian theology on the wages of sin and substitutionary punishment. No part of Jesus can be God for all parts of Jesus had to die. This is why Romans 10:9 makes salvation a condition of believing that God - in his unitarian nature -...

So, you reject the trinity, then?

LOL. It doesn’t answer the question at all. But that’s OK.

What verse says the personal name of the Holy Spirit is Jesus?

What reason does he have to believe this?

Because it’s my question. God, the Father’s personal name is YHWH. His only begotten son’s personal name is Jesus. IF the HS is a person, he must have a personal name. So, what is it?

What is the personal name of the Holy Spirit, again?

Nonsense. The purpose of the Founding was to spread Christianity, in addition to trade. What’s contrary about that?

Your premises are wrong, which lead you to wrong conclusions. You are drowning in evidence while denying there is any.

There are so many now that RvW is gone. I was thinking return God and prayer to the classroom, school events, etc. EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW Another would be to hold the Federal government accountable for upholding actual federal law, like border security, deportation, etc. Also...

He calls himself an atheist but is actually a skeptic. He does not have a basis to defend any position, just rest comfortably in holding doubtful any position. Talk about luke warm.

Ironically, I read this today in my daily devotional reading. It struck me that "may be" found blameless is 1 of 2 options, with the other option may NOT be found blameless.

Yes. Jesus said he would divide. True, huh? Have you read the book? Your fact-free, evidence free word view is showing itself again. Read Revelation.

Ahem. Muslims are not Atheists.

That's right. Christianity is an exclusive religion. You have your moral poles reversed. It is hate that wants to equate the path of destruction with the path of life. It's your choice and your consequence. We don't hate your for your choice. We pity you. Agreed and besides the point. LOL...

Your own standard defies your acceptance criteria. Said differently, your acceptance criteria has either already been met or you are not accepting the proper application of your own acceptance criteria. Those most enslaved are those who falsely believe they are free. This Goethe quote applies...

Again, so much for your evidence based approach to life. Do you condemn a cure because - at times - people do not recover from the disease? Or do you let the exception be the exception and the 99.9% of the time be the rule? It should be noted that before the modern era, the Christian church was...