Search results

Nope - but that wasn't even a good dodge. I asked you to show me where the BIBLE tells us that Abraham knew Jesus - like YOU claimed back in posts #739 & 748. If you can't - then just admit you stuck your foot in your mouth and move on . . .

What are you talking about?? I just used these three Parables to destroy your position. Don't just make a moronic hit-and-run claim. Show me HOW I used these Parables incorrectly . . .

Okay - then show me where Abraham knew Jesus. Chapter and Verse, please. The SON always existed. "Jesus" was His name when He was incarnated into man - and Abraham NEVER met Him until He ascended.

This is outright heresy. The idea that we can simply "believe" in God and be disobedient and STILL be saved is a contradiction. Jesus speaks to that abominable LIE - over and over and over again in the Gospel. In the Parable of the Talents In the Parable/Lesson of the Sheep and the Goats In the...

And this is a PERFECT example of why the OSAS LIE is not only naive - but spiritually arrogant. The faithful/obedient servant IS saved. That servant, however, can choose to walk away from God at ANY time because of his FREE WILL and be LOST forever. This is why we are admonished in Scripture...

This is a moronic and linguistically-bankrupt statement. You keep making this asinine claim but so far, have utterly FAILED to provide any etymology to substantiate it. WHO told you that "Papacy" meant "union of Church and state". More importantly - WHY didn't you do your fact-checking -...

Rom 12:12, 15:13, Heb. 11:1 are about the HOPE of becoming saved. Hope is the ONE virtue we won't need in Heaven. The Scriptures tell us over and over to have "Hope". WHY would a person who believes in OSAS have a need for hope if they are certain that they are guaranteed salvation?? AGAIN...

Soooooo, you actually believe that disobedient believers can be saved?? Show me some Scriptural proof of that ludicrous claim . . .

Abraham had NO idea who Jesus was. Where do you get your manure??

And that's because you have absolutely NO grasp on what "Faith" actually is. As I have told you on MANY occasions: Faith = Belief + Obedience. Without either ingredient there is NO faith.

That is completely FALSE. Demons absolutely believe in God - and the Word of God states this. From your own KJV: James 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. Matt. 8:28-29 When he arrived at the other side in the region of the...

Christians ALSO believe in ONE God - so what's your point??.

I don't know where you get your stupid "facts" - and I don't really care. I DO know that you are wrong because you never seem to be able to present any evidence for your moronic claims. First of all - "Papacy" does NOT mean "Church and state", Einstein. Whoever told you that was lying and was...

And, as I've educated you before - a thousand of your pathetic denials don't equal one shred of evidence . . .

YOU keep trying to tell us that faith is "believing". It's MUCH more that that. As I have shown you repeatedly - ANYBODY can believe - even the DEMONS (James 2:10). However - NOT everybody has faith . . .

The joy in MY salvation is called "HOPE" (Rom 12:12, 15:13, Heb. 11:1). I have the hope that I will be saved as I cooperate with His saving grace (Matt. 24:13). This is what keeps me going every day . . .

First of all - there is NO getting around the fact that Heb. 11:35 references 2 Macc. 7:1-42 almost verbatim. Secondly - the "Armor of God" in Ephesians is taken from Wisdom. I realize how devastating this is for you - but you must submit to the Word of God. Your simplistic denials are not...

WRONG. The Greek word for "Knowledge" that is used here means a "FULL and EXPERIENTIAL" knowledge. It is a relationship of FAITH - not just an intellectual knowledge. The word is "EPIGNOSIS" - not gnosis or oida which indicate a simple intellectual familiarity. This passage is about born...

Then, by ALL means - refute those interpretations, Einstein . . .

And I've already PROVEN that you are wrong. As I educated you earlier - Irenaeus lists ALL of the Popes from Peter to his day. Tertullian ALSO writes about the office of the Papacy - and BOTH were writing in the SECOND century. You don't have an historical leg to stand on - just ignorance as...