Search results

Answer me this: What did Jesus pray for in John 17:20-23 if NOT for the unity of His Church?? Who ELSE should the Church be unified with?? You can't possibly be this dense . . . Precisely. The Church is UNIFIED in doctrine and belief. That's because the Catholic Church is not a...

Soooo - are you FINALLY admitting that you LIED?? Are you FINALLY admitting that I NEVER claimed that the Catholic Church was in 100% doctrinal and Hierarchical unity with another church?? Good for you. I have stated ALL along that the Catholic Church is the Original Tree from which...

And the Church has ALwAYS taught that the Eucharist is a RE-presentation of that ONE sacrifice, which is an ETERNAL sacrifice (Rev. 13:8). There is nothing MORE Biblical than that . . .

No - this is a thread ABOUT the Eucharist - so John 6 is a perfect fit since the Bread of Life Discourse (John 6:22-59) is ALL about the Eucharist. John 6:53 “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you EAT (trogo) the FLESH (sarx)of the Son of Man and DRINK (pee'-no) his BLOOD (hah'-ee-mah), you...

The only thing you "caught" was a case of bad math . . .

You documented nothing about this phantom "98%". On the other hand - I pretty much schooled you on your bad math. Remember: 100% - 18.5% = 81.5%. It doesn't equal 98%, sparky . . .

Why do you keep lying when you know I'm just going to publicly expose you for it. Let's do it this way: Point me to the post where I made the claim that the Catholic Church is in 100% full doctrinal and hierarchical agreement with another Church. When you can show me that - I will apologize...

I haven't "evaded" anything. I have repeatedly stated that The Bread of Life Discourse in John 6 is the "WHAT" regarding the Eucharist - and the Last Supper narratives are the "HOW". In other words - In John 6, Jesus told His followers that they had to EAT and DRINK their Paschal Lamb...

And I've already proven that at the very LEAST - 18% of Catholics receive under BOTH kinds. That's just here in the good ol' USA. That alone proves your claim to be a pathetic lie. Look - I realize how humiliating this must be for you - but digging your self into a deeper hole isn't helping...

This has ALWAYS been my favorite argument against Transubstantiation and the Real Presence. - A non-Catholic Christian can believe that God merely spoke - and the universe leaped into existence out of NOTHING. - They can believe that God opened up the Sea to allow people to cross through it...

Okay - so now you're dead wrong on TWO points. Your original argument was that the Catholic Church "withholds" the cup from the Laity. I proved that to be a lie. Your next charge is that 98% are "forbidden" from receiving the cup. This has ALSO been proven to be a big, fat lie. - I gave you...

Since you can't seem to understand how moronic your position is - let me ask YOU a question. WHO do you want the Church to have 100% unity with? The United States is a unified country of 50 states. It has unity with itself. The Catholic Church is a unified body of about 20 Rites. Who ELSE...

And I've already BURIED your bogus "98%" rubbish with some simple math. Besides - your argument from the beginning has been that the cup was "WITHHELD" from the laity - so "offering" is ALL the difference. Consider yourself factually and mathematically spanked . . .

Not only is this bad math - it's flimsy logic. Let's say that the cup was offered to the laity ONLY in the United States - where is is absolutely available. I'm not including ANY other countries here - even though the Cup is available in MOST European and South American countries as well...

And all I can say to you is that this is a debate for another thread. I would LOVE to believe that Paul wrote Hebrews - but the evidence against that notion is overwhelming. In the end - it's not important who wrote it down - it's the AUTHOR, the Holy Spirit.

Sooooo, your response is to tell me to go to a Protestant website and look up their commentaries on this topic?? YOU can't answer these things yourself?? You see - that's the danger of cherry-picking Scripture the way you do. You don't LEARN anything that way.

In other words - you stuck your foot in your mouth and you have NO evidence for your false claim? That's what I thought . . . Paul said that he was forgiving sins in the "Person of Christ" (in Persona Chirsti). How is that ANY different from what Ignatius wrote about the people seeing the...

This is a really stupid argument because, as I have shown - not ONE SINGLE group has 100% doctrinal or hierarchical agreement with anybody but themselves. That's what makes a unique group "unique". I'll dumb it down for you so that you can understand: If say, the Lutheran church and the...

This was a MINOR point in my response to you - but MOST scholars do not believe that Paul wrote Hebrews - and that the evidence is so overwhelming, that it is not even up for debate. From Wikipedia: Authorship of the Epistle to the Hebrews In general, the evidence against Pauline authorship is...

I already read posts 138, 140 and 144 - and there is ZERO evidence for your claim that "98%" of Catholics are prohibited from drinking the Cup during Mass. HOWEVER - I read the link from post #146 and SAW that percentage - but it had NOTHING to do with what YOU said. It simply stated that out...