Search results

Marks, are you OK? I literally just answered this question in my last post, # 838. No, I do not believe Michael became Jesus. There are several life forms revealed in Scripture, god, angel, man. Although similar in some ways (made in our image), different in other ways, god and angels are...

You're welcome! I am proud of who I am. If I were a mystic, I'd be a proud one. Why are you not proud to be a mystic (as you say I am calling you one, as if you are not one or deny being one WHILE advocating mysticism in many posts)? Not that I want to hijack your thread but since you brough...

Interesting. I never heard that before. Where can I reference that?

Only if one is a mystic can one attest in any serious way that one can sit on their own right hand. That we, including Jesus, is made in the image of God is proof enough neither we nor Jesus is God. If God made all these other God's, that is what the text would say, rather than all this...

Why do you say it is the incorrect name? (I already said it is the English translation of YHWH, like Yeshua is the name of our lord in his native tongue) How does recognizing Yeshua is the first witness to Jehovah denying the JW doctrine? No. @Aunty Jane explained it is a speculative belief...

No. And I think you know we don’t agree on this point and why we don’t agree. Make a Blessed Day!

It’s not about my feelings but your inability to agree with:

Again, it is not a fallacy because it is not an argument. Robert quoted Scripture that proves his point.

You are the one who has not offered a credible alternative to explicit Scripture @ Rev 1:5 that states Jesus is THE Witness to God Jehovah. Can you understand how this could be interpreted as support for the organization that goes by that name?

Already provided. This is what you do in many threads; ask for evidence that was JUST provided. Although I was baptized as an infant in the RCC, I consider it a kind of joke as there is no Biblical support for infant baptism.

Yea, this along the lines of my thoughts. Jesus only has one glorified body. He may have appeared different but appearance does not mean an actual different body.

You are hopeless! I provided the definition of Jehovah, which is the English translation of YHWH. He provided the Scripture of Jesus being Jehovah's Witness. I posted that verse proving what he said is correct. What is your problem?

What a straw man argument. Jesus is a witness to God Jehovah, period. It doesn't matter the derivation. Talk about moving the goal posts.

Jehovah Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster Jehovah noun Save Word To save this word, you'll need to log in. Log In Je·ho·vah | \ ji-ˈhō-və \ Definition of Jehovah : GOD sense 1a

It is the English name for God. Just like Yeshua, the name of our lord, is not Jesus in the original text. Jesus is the English name for our lord. For the record, I do not like such name changes but I recognize this is how people use language. Another example is the capital city of Italy, in...

BS. My question reveals insight into the foolishness of your statement. Robert was NOT saying Jesus was a JW corporate member. He proved Jesus was a witness to Jehovah using Scripture. All you got is this ridiculous claim, judging the proved argument invalid. Where is your response to Rev 1:5...

You are right; It's not an argument but a matter of fact. I recently read a book, Atheism on Trial. The author made the point that modern say atheists are basically making the same claim as atheists from 2300 years ago. If you adhere to School of X and another adheres to the School of Y, both...

No. You are quoting a verse that does not even apply to God’s Anointed. Even if it did, it only says what people will call him. No direct and simple ‘Jesus is God’ because it is not true.

Yet you imply these cultural norms rise to the level of Scriptural mandate. Not cool.

It’s just not true. What unitarian verse do you think says that AND leaves doubt about it? Scripture says Jesus is the son of God and leaves no doubt about it. MK 1:1 See the difference?