Search results

I totally agree. A person believes and has a full, experiential knowledge (epignosis) of Christ - then falls away and STOPS believing. This is where they LOSE everything (Matt. 5:13, Matt. 7:21, Rom. 11:22, Heb. 10:26-27, 2 Peter 2:20-22, 2 Peter 3:17, Rev. 3:5, Rev. 22:19). That's NOT what...

Thanks for that confused and ignorant rant. However - you didn't shed one single ray of light in opposition to the idea that Mary was a perpetual virgin . . .

At least YOU realize that I exposed your LIE when you said the following: "In any case, only popes and intimates and nowadays the new Lutheran Catholics, may receive the cup." Another anti-Catholic fairy tale bites the dust . . .

Sooooo, He DIDN'T say, This is my body and This is my blood?? Is that what you are saying??

And again - you refuse to understand that the ONLY thing that was finished on the cross was the work of Redemption. We were PAID FOR. The work of Salvation requires our cooperation. This is what the Bible teaches again and again . . . (Matt. 7:19-23, Matt. 10:22, Matt. 24:13, Matt. 25:31–46...

That's NOT what the Bible teaches. In fact - it warns that ANY person - born again or not - can fall away and be lost forever . . . Romans 11:22 “See, then, the kindness and severity of God: severity toward those who fell, but God's kindness to you, provided you REMAIN in his kindness...

Then your problem is with JESUS - and not the Church. The practice of telling our sins directly to a priest is based directly in Scripture. Three times in the Gospels (Matt. 16:19, 18:18 and John 20:23), we read where Jesus gave the Apostles the power to forgive sins or to hold them bound...

Uh huh - except for the following cases . . . Romans 11:22 “See, then, the kindness and severity of God: severity toward those who fell, but God's kindness to you, provided you REMAIN in his kindness; otherwise you to will be cut off.” Paul is warning the faithful to REMAIN in God’s favor or...

In other words - you can't explain why you hold to a Canon of Scripture that was declared by the Catholic Church. Is that it - or do you deny that it was the Catholic Church who declared the Canon of Scripture? A little less "LOL-ing" and a little more 'splainin' would help . . .

And falsely claiming that He had siblings - without any real evidence ISN'T a distraction from Christ?? If you have a valid argument against the "other" Mary - then let's have it . . .

Sorry, pal - you can't get away from Scripture on this matter. Like I said - even where Scripture NAMES these so-called siblings of Jesus - it later shows them to be the children of another woman - and NOT the Mother of Jesus. I have never heard a good argument against this fact. The weight of...

I see that you've been polluted by Loraine Boettner's list. Boettner's book, "Roman Catholicicsm" has LONG been referred to as the "Anti-Catholic Bible" - and with good reason. Anti-Catholics base their opinions on lies, myths, half-truths and fairy tales - so Boettner's book is...

Of the 344 times we see the use of the word "brother" (Adelphos(oi) in the NT, we see that . . . - There are only 41 cases (12%) where it clearly or probably refers to a family sibling: - There are 47 cases (14%) where it may or may not refer to a family sibling: - HOWEVER - there are 256...

Not only is this absolute nonsense - this is a blatant LIE. ALL Catholics in a state of grace and not in mortal sin may receive from the cup. How do I know this? Because I am an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion and not only do I partake of the cup - I offer it to everybody in line...

First of all - if she IS the mother of God - then it is not only fitting, but PROPER to call her that. The Bible doesn't use the terms "Trinity" or "Incarnation" - but these are commonly-used terms in Christianity. Secondly - I never said that the bible didn't say that Jesus had "Adelphoi"...

No - you've said your piece on Catholicism. You STILL don't understand what "Roman" Catholic means.

This WOULD be a funny post - if not so tragically ignorant and stupid. ALL of the points marked in RED are either false accusations or can be substantiated by Sacred Scripture. This means that YOU have posted a litany of lies . . . For starters, #'s 1, 2, 8 &14 ALL speak of "dead" saints. How...

And once again, you post confused nonsense . . .

Then, maybe YOU should heed her words . . .

Ahhhhh - so, in other words, you cannot substantiate the killing of "billions" or even "millions" - so you point instead to the Eucharist. That's a nice cop-out - but it's only based on YOUR lack of faith in the words of Jesus: John 6:53-56 Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, unless...