Search results

The same way that you hearing a person's voice life or in person is different from hearing it ... wait for it ... through a telephone. I've referenced Deut 18:15-18 several times. Have you read it and understood how it applies to the word becoming flesh?

LOL Reading trinitarian dogma onto unitarian text not even referencing Jesus.

No man has seen God = literal God spoke to Moses face to face = figurative. When we say today, "we saw eye to eye" it is a figure of speech.

That which emerged from God, his reason, logic, voice or word. In the beginning, God said. This is no triune apology. John is mirroring GE 1 except introduces the Messiah at v14. Before time itself was measured, the Voice was speaking. The Voice was and is God. 2 This celestial Word...

Not at all. Jesus is not referred to in John 1 until v14.

Do you spiritually discern the next verse, where he gave the name of YHWH, which is the name for him to be remembered all through time? Or do you just ignore it, pretending "I AM" is what he even said, which it isn't. There is no ‘great I am’ in Scripture and neither God nor Jesus ever actually...

Girls around the world should taught to model QEII.When I think of her, the first thought that comes to mind is duty. A woman of great honor.

Trinitarians tend to agree that there is a trinity. :D

I've already explained what is wrong with this. Because it is wrong, I dismiss it without addressing it. How about I copy and paste a bunch of websites and expect you to address it point by point and declare victory until you do? Not very friendly or conversational, right? :p

"Am" is a form of the verb "to be," to exist. "I" is a pronoun, not a personal name. I think you know that is not God's name but embrace making false connections to what Jesus said.

He is 100% man. You got that right. However, John 1 says nothing about Jesus being God. It's just not there no matter how many times you assert it.

Yes the question is far but my point is not harsh. It is rude (if not harsh) to sweep aside a question and ask one of your own. Why not answer the OP's question AND THEN pose one of your own? That seems more conversational.

No sir! Don't be intellectually dishonest. The text does not say 'the Father' but God in his wholeness, in his unitarian nature. The text says God - in his wholeness, in his unitarian nature - is not under Jesus' authority. And the text does not say God is not under Jesus' authority but an...

4-7 but possibly 11: God the Father God the HS God the son, in his divine nature. God the son, in his human nature. S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7, the 7 Spirits of God referenced in Revelations. God of Grace God of Love God of Mercy God of Justice THE LORD OF HEAVEN’S ARMIES. I may have missed a...

See above comments above regarding 1 Cor 15:23-28.

Are you ignoring the explicit Scripture of 1 Cor 15:23-28 the makes God - in his wholeness, in his unitarian nature - an exception to who is under Jesus’ authority? It is precisely such juxtapositions of Jesus from God - in his wholeness, in his unitarian nature that repeatedly make clear they...

1 COR 15:28 makes explicitly clear that when it says every thing under Jesus, God is the exception. God = YHWH. The meaning of lord is master, someone you hold allegience to. There are dozens of lords in Scripture but only one true God, Jesus' God.

Here is the problem. One does not define equality if 2 things are equal in 1 way but in every way. Only YHWH, the Father, is God. Only Jesus is THE Son of God, resurrected into a glorified body so far. The Father never dies. Jesus died. Not equal.

Totally foolish interpretation. Just because we honor people does not mean we do not also honor God. For instance, we have (had) holiday's for Washington, Lincoln, Columbus and MLK Jr. This does not make them God.

Why bother coming to a forum to only copy and paste?