Search results

Shocked to read this reply @Phoneman777. The I realized that Bruno is another mystic. "Somehow" his ex-post facto theology makes sense. You will not open his ears or eyes. :( @Phoneman777 made it pretty clear Scripture is not talking about God's agape but the agape of the saints. Maybe you no...

Yea, right! What are you apolozing for? Mocking. And you admitted you are still mocking me. Not too sincere. ? Comments are not dodged. Questions are dodged. My comment is this thread on heresy has changed in your mind to me. It's so funny that you presume to use a pet name for me...

Me too. It's what the verse needs to speak to the person at that time.

Hmmm, maybe. It depends. There is a political theory that actually applies to any controversial idea. Given that one holds a false or bad or incorrect idea, it takes them time to be repeatedly exposed to a better idea before accepting that idea. The theory states it takes 20 interactions to...

Pot. Call Kettle Black. What Scripture does not say in any manner, shape or form is God is 3in1 with 3 persons making up a Godhead. This is true not matter your line of inquiry - or to what language you retreat.

Please explain more. :)

I'm sorry if I missed this but has the conversation expressed equality between 'not having a sin nature' with 'being incapable of sin?" I ask because I see these as different, one is actual; the other is potential. One is the risk of wrong doing exists; the other displaces the risk with actual...

I don't understand how you are connecting the 2 as they seem independent? I think 1 Corinthians 15:45-49 explains beautifully along with v 21-28. The seed of Adam was corrupt. So, God started anew Creation in Jesus, through which redemption of us all is to unfold.

While I am not part of the OSAS crowd, you support your position using OT standards, Old Covenant consequences, which never applied to the Gentiles to begin with, which most Christians are. Thank God it is about relationships because if it were based on my own performance, while outstanding in...

No. Your own analysis proves this to be untrue. YHWH is masculine not feminine. An attribute, his spirit, is not a person but is referred to using the feminine form. Not only are they not the same person, a spirit is not a person at all but an attribute of a person, of a Being.

Specifically, Sola Scriptura is a statement in reaction to church abuse to not rely on the contrivances of man but the word of God alone. Luther said, by this convict me. They could only convict him of violating their own corrupt politically and economically driven edicts. One of my favorites...

Absurd. Words are WHAT's not WHO's. Using words is an attribute of being, not a separate Being. The most anti-trinitarian book in the whole Bible, John also explicitly tells us at 20:31 that everything he wrote was to prove something other than the idea that Jesus is God; namely, that Jesus is...

Agreed. In another thread 'Jesus is God' the statement was made that the trinity MUST be taken on faith. Why this is a must is another Trinitarian leap.

Jesus forgave sins and delegated that power to the Apostles. John 20:23.

Not sure where you get the idea that religion is about proof? Moreover, GIVEN we worship a living God, why do you think the original thoughts, prayers, meditations, feelings and responses to the faith NEED to be preserved rather than NEED to evolve as cultures, languages and scientific...

Yea, the agenda was the tradition's of man to cancel the word of God. The 'early church Father' is not Scripture. And so you cancel the word of God in order to hand down your own tradition. And this is only one example among many others. Mark 7:13 NLT

Is that you being a human with 5 distinct parts? body mind conscience heart emotions

A trinitarian translation invention. Translations that don't have "James" in the title have it right. 1 John 5:7-8 New Living Translation 7 So we have these three witnesses— 8 the Spirit, the water, and the blood—and all three agree.

So, you gave an insincere apology, doubling down on your sin. :rolleyes: Indeed.

This is the biggest logical fallacy trinitarians embrace; that the death of Jesus on the cross does not represent total and complete death in every literal manner, shape and form. If he did not die in the literal sense of the word, his sacrifice was in vain. There is absolutely nothing in...