Search results

WRONG. If there was true expiation for sin in the Old Covenant, there would have been NO need for Jesus. The sacrifices offered to God were IMPERFECT. Only Jesus was the PERFECT sacrifice (Heb. 10:14). Heb. 8:7 For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have...

Apparently, you didn't read the posts prior to this one, as usual . . .

First of all - simply "missing" mass isn't a sin. Purposely refusing to go to mass when you know it is your required Sunday obligation with FULL knowledge and consent makes it sinful. Don't forget - committing a mortal sin isn't "accidental". It is done with full consent and knowledge that it...

No, there wasn't because there was no expiation of sin with the blood of animals. Jesus was the perfect sacrifice - there was NO other. Study your Bible . . . And the Hebrew word used here is לאות, which means a "PROOF" or a "SIGN" - not a token. Circumcision was a PROOF of entering into the...

Agreed, for the most part - except for your comment in RED. It's not difficult to commit a mortal sin. Mortal sin requires grave sin, knowledge of the gravity and full consent consent. People commit mortal sins all the time.

First of all -= NOTHING in the Old Covenant made a man born again. Secondly - circumcision wasn't just a "token" of the Covenant - it was a REQUIREMENT of the Law. It was a REQUIREMENT for entering into the Covenant. Finally - Gen 17:14, which YOU referenced, says the following: Gen 17:14 Any...

Actually - this is what you said: "Salvation is a one time event even in Catholicism." This is incorrect and not what the Catholic Church teaches.

Uh huh - and Jesus Christ gave His Church Supreme Authority on earth - that WHATEVER it ordained on earth (i.e., the canon of Scripture) would also be ordained in Heaven (Matt. 16:18-19, Matt. 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 16:12-15, John 20:21-23). There was NO NT canon when Jesus was alive - and...

It's BOTH. What do we see just 2 chapters earlier?? We see the Baptism of our Lord. What elements are present?? WATER and the HOLY SPIRIT. And, as I already showed you - the Bible shows us the varying phases of the ongoing process of salvation: We have been saved (Acts 2:38, Rom. 5:1, 8:24...

No - my Google is working fine. However - YOU are the one who made the asinine accusation - so the onus is on YOU to prove it. As for the Word - I gave you no less that FIVE passages that prove you wrong. Evidence is stronger that unsubstantiated attacks . . .

No - I understand that a lot of non-Catholics want to hijack the title of "Catholic" when they are not.

Then PROVE it. What I stated comes straight from the Word of God (Matt. 24:13, 1 Cor. 3:12–15, Rev. 2:7, 2:26, Rev. 3:21) . . .

And a man could NOT be a true Jew according to the Covenant without being circumcised in the flesh. So, there goes your argument against infant Baptism . . .

And I'm not trying to poursuade YOU of anything. As I have stated on numerous occasions, my mission here is simple: To expose the lies and myths that people like you and your anti-Catholic buddies here like to spread so that others who are seeking the truth won't be seduced by those lies...

And this ALL pertains to the RITE (Roman) - not the title of the Church. You really need to do your homework . . .

And that's just too bad. The Catholic Church has been in existence from the beginning. If a Protestant wants to use this title to fit their situation - they are wrong. Just as a Catholic is not a Presbyterian or a Baptist or a non-denominational Evangelical - none of them are Catholic. To...

Wrong. The Catholic Church has ALWAYS taught that salvation is a process, whereby we cooperate with God's grace throughout our life by responding with faith and obedience. The salvation we receive at Baptism is NOT the end of the story. This is why the Bible is clear about the phases of...

Actually - I've never had an argument or debate with YOU because you always dodge the question, post an irrelevant passage of Scripture - and run. Having an intelligent conversation with you is equally as impossible as having one with Taken . . .

No - you make unsubstantiated comments - then you run . . .