Search results

Wrong, sparky. I never called anbody a "falsifier". In fact, up until now - I've never even typed that work in my entire life.

I'm not, Einstein. I already have a Pope . . .

Now, that I agree with. Celibacy and the single life is not for everyone - but, neither is marriage.

For starters - building maintenance costs are a reality of this world. You can't ask a congregation to meet in a field every week. Anyway, they would have to own and maintain the field. Now, if this is aimed at the Catholic Church, which I'm not saying it is - the Catholic Church is perceived...

What part of what I wrote is a "contradiction"??

Not good enough Rollo. You completely ignored what Jesus was telling them Jesus told them, "As the Father sent me, so I send YOU." What did the Father send Him to do?? To bring about the FORGIVENESS of sins. Explain THIS part: "Whose sins YOU forgive are forgiven them, and whose sins YOU...

That's because of your lack of faith and Scriptural ignorance. Let me ask YOU: Do you believe that an omnipresent God spoke and the universe leapt into existence - but He can't be present in the Eucharist?? Now THAT sounds pretty dense to me . . .

Kung may be a "Romanist" whatever that is - but he's not a faithful Catholic. Anyway - I never claimed to have "greater" credentials than Kung or anybody else. I trust in Christ's Church more than I do a disobedient dissident. I do admire your scheming cowardice to a certain extent, however...

HUH?? We're talking about the Book of Life mentioned in Rev. 3:5. Pay attention.

I can see your point, although I don't agree with you fully. Your statement above in RED - I totally disagree with. Paul was one of the strongest examples of faith in the NT and he was single. In fact he recommended the single life as a more excellent way to serve the Lord (1 Cor. 7:25-40)...

I would have to disagree. The physical aspect is a vital component of marriage. God doesn't say that the two become one spirit - but one flesh. When the Bible speaks of the flesh being "wicked" - it is NOT talking about our actual flesh, blood, bones and tissue. It is talking about fleshly...

It's not St. Christopher who protects anybody. It is a plea for help (prayer). Read the opening words (in RED), sparky . . .

That's not true at all. I see St. Christopher medals AND statues all the time. He wasn't "removed" - just his feast day. Do your homework . . .

Not according to Jesus: John 20:21-23 (Jesus) said to them again, "Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, so I send you." And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, "Receive the holy Spirit. Whose sinsYOU forgive are forgiven them, and whose sins YOU retain are...

And, according to Col. 2:17 - all of these things were just SHADOWS of what was to come. The reality is Christ. The Manna (bread) and Passover Lamb that was to be completely consumed is now that Lamb of God - OUR Paschal Lamb, which we consume in the Eucharist (bread). Not that difficult to...

And in the end, it was Kung who repudiated certain beliefs - NOT The Church. Kung has an agenda. He is just another Protestant like YOU - rejecting Christ's Church in favor of the teachings of mere men. The Catholic Church hasn't "twisted" history. It has recorded its history - warts and all...

As for the rest of this ridiculously anti-Catholic OP - Jesus never preached a Gospel of "faith alone". That was Luther. The Gospel of Jesus centered on faith and OBEDIENCE of Faith - in which works were a vital and necessary component of faith. Belief alone is NOT faith. Belief + Works =...

Pretty sure I already destroyed this nonsenes in post $66 . . .

I'm not "arguing" - I'm stating fact. It's not the Church that doesn't like Kung - it's the other way around. This is proven by his heresy. When a person goes into heresy - they repudiate formerly-held beliefs. The Church has NEVER changed a doctrinal position. Kung did. Oh, and I never...

Really?? More nonsense from a person who is totally ignorant of what the Church teaches . . . First of all - The bible NEVER says that Mary had other children. It only speaks of the "Adelphoi" of Jesus. The Greek word "Adelphos and all of its variations is used in the NT a whopping 344 times...