Search results

Attribute bad intent to Supremely Holy intent.

Not an answer to my 2 simple yes or no questions: Are there any benefits to using 'lots of words'? Is God foolish for using 'lots of words' per Solomon's maxim? Yes or no?

Are there any benefits? For instance, many would say that God could not get his point across without writing 66 books, are also 'lots of words'. Does that mean God is also foolish per Solomon's maxim?

Being tangential and ambiguous is his thing. :rolleyes:

Answer: That Jesus is NOT God, incarnate, but the Anointed. Who was Jesus Anointed by? By the LORD God almighty, not his Father but our Father. At least, according to Jesus and how he taught us to pray.

In fact, the opposite is true. Jesus said his Father, who alone is the true God, is greater than he is. :eek: An odd thing, indeed, to say if you are God incarnate.

Well, putting aside the desperate reaching of what Jesus said to mean he was claiming to be a deity, it is beyond any doubt that there is no verse where Jesus taught the trinity doctrine. An inconvenient fact: Jesus never taught the trinity. Again, they'll desperately reach for who to baptize...

Another Golden Nugget.

Reading your posts is like reading someone who denies gravity even though it can be demonstrated. An undeniable fact of Scripture is that Jesus died. This is how we know he is not God. Is it your position that God died? Is it your position that God can die? Scripture says Jesus died. It does...

The trinitarian absurdity is to deny this passage makes explicit that God, in his unitarian nature, acted and is the subject of the sentence. "Under his feet" is a difference "him" that did the acting, which is to say, Jesus is the object of the sentence. This is NOT the same as Jack and Jill...

Yes, you most certainly do try to push Jesus into the position of His Father, who alone is God. How do I know this? Jesus said it at John 17:3. I know you must invoke dualism. When Jesus says his father is the only true God, this cannot be allowed to remain exclusive. All other God's must be...

It's awesome how you just make stuff up to support your doctrine.

Among men, sure. Jesus’ name is above all names - except for God himself. This is the clear meaning of 1 Cor 11:3 and Christianity’s End Game @ 1 Cor 15:23-28, where there is an explicit exception for God. And this is the plain language of how one knows Jesus is NOT God

Doubling down on missing the mark. FYI, I was a Top 1% donor to Trump's campaign. It's hard to get more right wing than me. LOL Agreed. And Scripture also says men (and women) will be the Bride and Wife of the man Jesus. This is an apparent contradiction and it is a reason people don't...

Thanks for responding to my direct question. :) I get that but the question is about it being irreversible. Or, are you saying that being killed for not using it is what is irreversible?

It was quite obvious to the Apostles also ... 2,000 years later we are communicating by sending electrons around the world.

Friend, only what God allows is possible. If he chooses to hide something - even from his own Son - then it IS impossible to know. I don't mind reading your fervent posts from a speculation perspective. To be honest, I think you are close. I have reason to believe the end is September of 2028...

Good Afternoon, I noticed for some time now a thread that I am subscribed to has a recent post but I don't have a current alert. Is that because of a setting on alerts? Or am I missing something? Wrangler

I don't know and tend to be leery of claiming to know more than my lord and savior. No one knows the day or hour. The angels in heaven don't know, and the Son himself doesn't know. Only the Father knows. Matthew 24:36

Just out of curiosity, how do you come to that conclusion?