Search results

Time for another Bible lesson . . . The "Seventy-two" that Jesus sent out in Luke 10:16 are listed in Church history as Bishops of the Early Church by the historian Hippolytus. Among them is Ananias, Bishop of Damascus, who baptized Paul in Acts 9. Here's a little hermeneutical rule you might...

No, he wasn't. What Bible are YOU reading?? Saul knew exactly who the Church was - and he persecuted it. What he didn't know was that the Church was Christ Himself. That's YOUR folly as well. aggressivechristianity.net is NOT Christ's Church, son. It's an online cult that was hatched in 1980...

No - you were responding to my conversation with michaelvpardo, whereinh, I showed him that to know Christ's Church is to know HIM. YOUR response came out of left field and had nothing to do with that.

Hegelian Dialect has absolutely nothing to do with Luke 10:16. or Acts 9:4-5. It's just your little way of trying to sound intelligent while evading the real issue.

And, as usual - your argument makes absolutely zero sense and has strayed from a lucid exchange into confused silliness . . .

And if you reject His Church - you reject HIM (Luke 10:16). In Acts 9:4-5, Jesus equates his Body – the Church - with his very self: He fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?" He said, "Who are you, sir?" The reply came, "I am Jesus, whom...

Ahhh, so the truth lies in YOUR online cult aggressivechristianity.net, which was hatched in 1980?? You keep dreaming . . .

If you don't know His Church - you don't know Him. If you reject His Church - you reject Him and the ONE who sent Him (Luke 10:16). Good luck with that.

Don't go by the number - go by the truth. The Church is the pillar and foundation of Truth (1 Tim. 3:15).

No - a Catholic doesn't reject the teachings of the Church. That's called "Protestantism." You're an apostate Catholic. You should look that up. Happened in the 16th century . . .

First of all - a million "witnesses" can be wrong. Secondly - YOU are the one who referred to me as a "hypocrite", then didn't have the courage to tell me WHY you called me that. If you don't have evidence for your claims - then you shouldn't resort to false witness . . .

Oh, maybe from this little remark from post #1102: "According to history, did not the Council of Nicea (consisting of the Universal Church) and Jerome, compiled the “Books” together in A,D. 325 as opposed to your claim it was the CC doing the same by the end of the 4th Century, almost 70 years...

That's fine, if you want to admit to that. However - if you call somebody else a hypocrite - at least have the courage to tell them why. If you can't do that - then maybe you should stop bearing false witness . . .

Ummmm, gee, I hate to be the one to tell you this, sparky - but the Council of Nicaea was convened by the CATHOLIC Church. ALL of the bishops were Catholic. ALL of the decisions and declarations made by the Catholic hierarchy. Where did you get the warped idea that all of those Bishops and...

Care to elaborate? Yeah - I didn't think so . . .

Wrong. You know what you know because of your Protestant Fathers. The problem is that you went further off the rails than they did because you have invented some newer, wackier ideas. This is the fruit of the confusion that is Protestantism.

I don't think it's about "having fun" or not. It's about being equipped with the truth - which you have proven NOT to be time and again. If you're not prepared to defend your statements - maybe a debate forum is NOT the best place for you to be spending your time.

And you're doing the same thing with the Scriptural evidence that Kepha31 presented as you did with what I presented. You can't intelligently address ANY of it, so you run away - leaving behind a trail of angry insults and stupid comments. Anybody reading this can see that you're NOT equipped...

NONE of your Protestant Gathers were God. That's why YOU should ask yourself why you're following a splinter of a splinter of a splinter of of a splinter of what they taught. Why do you believe what they taught - EXCEPT for the things you don't want to believe in?? This is what we Christians...

Actually - I've NEVER called anybody here a "liar". Unless you can find a post where I actually called somebody a "Liar" - then YOU have lied. You "rest" your case?? WHAT case?? The quote from Peter doesn't say anything about them being TOLD by God to write their letters down in a "Book", as...