Search results

I'm not the one who brought it into the conversation - YOU did. The onus is on YOU to define it. Translation: "I really stuck my foot in my mouth and now I am back-pedaling because I can't dig myself out of this hole."

Everybody has an opinion - and they don't matter. The Scriptural definition of what the Church is supposed to be is clear: - Jesus established ONE Church (Matt. 16:16-19). He prayed fervently that this Church remain ONE - as He and the Father are ONE (John 17:20-23). There is NO other. - Jesus...

This is nothing but evasive nonsense. I gave the Scriptural definition of what the Church is. YOU objected because I didn't use the term "Living Stones" - yet you can't define what it means. If you don't know what it means - then why would you object that I didn't use the term in the first place?

That's just another cop-out. YOU said that "Living stones" should be included in the definition of "Church". I'm asking you to define what "Living Stones" are.

Then define "Living Stones".

And you're just angry because I exposed your lies - and then LIED about me exposing your lies . . . How old are you, anyway??

You have utterly failed to address the Scriptural evidence I have presented but you continue to respond as if I had presented nothing. This is tantamount to the proverbial spoiled child who shuts his eyes and plugs his ears instead of learning his lesson . . .

Another completely irrelevant response. Stick to the conversation - or get out of the way . . .

Where does Scripture say that Jesus built MORE than ONE Church?? This is the Scriptural definition of Church - not yours or mine: - Jesus established ONE Church (Matt. 16:16-19). He prayed fervently that this Church remain ONE - as He and the Father are ONE (John 17:20-23). There is NO...

Most Protestant s DO refer to ALL Christians as being "the Church". Are you saying that you disagree with that?

Hey - 500 years of Protestant rebellion proves me right . . .

Why don't you all do your homework?? You're pretty lousy anti-Catholics - not that there is any such thins as a "good" one . . . This story is another classic example of how the media twists the Pope's words - and how anti-Catholics all over the world jump on those lies like a feeding frenzy...

And again - put your money where your mouth is and show me the post where I called anybody a "liar." You're just blowing more hot wind . . .

So I say? NO - what Scripture says (Matt. 16:18, John 17:20-23, Eph. 4:5).

Yup - others have said that but I proven that they are wrong - from Scripture. Now - CAN you address the Scriptural evidence I have presented - or will you simply respond with more impotent insults in a vain effort to mask your Scriptural ignorance?

Apparently, you don't understand OT TYPES and NT FULFILLMENTS. Study a little more - you'll get there . . .

What - did you forget what you posted?? This is what YOU said: "the original ark was made out of wood, BoL, and it's not that difficult to deduce that Mary is not" I showed you that the Bronze Serpent was a prefigurement of Christ - even though HE was not made of bronze. Is it that difficult to...

Yes - but I was responding to bbyrd's argument that Mary could not be the fulfillment of the Ark because it was made out of wood - and she was not.

The difference is - I never "called" you a "Liar" as you have claimed. Proving something and name-calling are two different things.

The Bronze Serpent on the pole that Moses created to cure the people was a prefigurement of Christ(Num. 21:8-9, John 3:14-15). Was HE made of bronze??