Search results

No - if this place is a pig sty - the "instigators", as you call them are those who LIE. Let's start with the lies the YOU just told: I never "told" you to butt out. I suggested it because you keep complaining about my conversations with others. So, YOU bore false witness against me...

Again - care to elaborate on what you mean by "pseudo-epigraphy" - or did it just sound like an intelligent thing to say? Can you tell me WHO told you that it wasn't Scripture but simply pseudo-epigraphy?

No - it's a poor prosecutor who can't prove the "defendant" wrong. The Deuterocanonical Books were considered Scripture during the life of Christ. When did they become "NOT" Scripture? Can you answer that? You're probably right - you have no business here. If you claim to accept the...

It's not "false witness" to observe that you've invented a different Christ than the one of Scripture. When you deny His Bodily Ascension - you reject a basic tenet of the Christian faith.

You'r free to reject the Holy Spirit if you want. You've already rejected Christ's Church so you might as well go all the way . . .

When Scripture plainly and clearly teaches something and a person denies it and that is not an opinion but an error. If it is night and I claim that it is day - I am wrong. It's a denial not an opinion. Scripture teaches us that Jesus ascended to the Father BODILY. Jesus ate with His Apostles...

Sure there is - it's called the Sacrament of Confirmation. It's not literal flames of fire - but the fire of the Holy Spirit that burns within us.

Spoken by a guy who has invented a different Christ than the one of Scripture . . .

And I might add - don't resort to posting anti-Catholic lies like so many so-called "Christians" do on this forum. It comes off as ridiculously hypocritical.

Ummmm, I'm not forcing my "opinion" on anybody - and everything I do here is for God's glory. I merely told YOU that you were wrong about us not needing teachers. Scripture clearly tells us that we do - and you keep rejecting this idea. The bottom line here is: If you don't want me to address...

The truth has set me free. What would YOU know about it anyway? You judge hearts now, do you?

And that sounds like moral relativism . . .

I wasn't even responding to YOU - I was conversing with ScottA - so, you might want to simply butt out of our conversation if you don't like it. Besides - I'm not even sure if Scott A and I are "brothers in Christ" anyway because he seems to have invented a different Christ than the Christ of...

It's the truth of Scripture - whether YOU reject it or not.

And again - your complete lack of understanding of the Gospel is the crux of your heresy. Jesus explained to Nicodemus the difference between being born of woman and being born of the Spirit (John 3:3-7) - and members of His Church are born of BOTH. Jesus ascended to the Father BODILY. Not...

The PHYSICALLY dead - and you know to what I was referring. As for WHO the Church is comprised of - it is BOTH. You cannot be born "again" if you haven't been born of a woman (John 3:3-7). The ONLY thing here that is "Antichrist" is your heretical belief. . .

No - it's not. It's what the Scriptures CLEARLY state: Matt. 28:18-20 “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and TEACHING them to obey everything...

Absolutely not. Jesus instituted the Church which is comprised of human beings - living and dead. Human beings are BOTH flesh and spirit. Your confusion stems from not following what the Word of God and His Church teaches but what YOU'VE invented for yourself.

AGAIN - I simply relayed what the Scriptures ALREADY said: That we indeed have teachers within the Church. God told His Church to TEACH - and that's why we have Teachers. When YOU say that we don't need teachers - you are rejecting God's Word. Like I said - it's not about ME or what I say-...

My mistake. I was simply replying to what Aspen was saying about him.