Search results

One says "Deuterocanonical" when one knows what they're talking about. One refers to the Deuterocanonical Bools as "Apocrypha when they are either anti-Catholic - or don't have a clue as to what "Apocrypha" means . . .

It doesn't make me feel anything. It simply exposes the ignorance of people who use words and have NO idea what they mean . . .

Not at all. It's just a little history lesson. You don't understand what "apocrypha" or "apocryphal" mean, which is the basis for your confusion.

A little advice: Wait until you have something useful to add to the conversation before responding . . .

Another non answer. Reply when you have a real answer to my question.

It was irrelevant to our conversation. Why don't you try being honest for a change?

Thank you for that completely irrelevant verse that has nothing to do with our conversation. A little advice: Don't quote Scripture until you learn what it means.

That's because you're reject the Trinity. The Son is ONE with His Father. Keep studying.

Next time - bring something bigger than a pea-shooter when you challenge somebody to a gunfight . . .

Thanks for that absolutely irrelevant verse that simply exposes your complete ignorance of Scripture . . .

No they're not. They're only called "Apocrypha" by anti-Catholics. who reject them as being inspired. They are called the "Deuterocanonical Books" by those who believe that they are inspired. YOU keep referring to them as "Apocrypha" which means one of two things: a. You reject their...

Ummmm, which Church is that in history? If you're going to claim that the Catholic Church isn't it - then which church was it?

Yet again, you illustrate that you don't have a clue as to what Christ's Church is. It's not a gaggle of millions of disobedient Lone Ranger, pseudo-believers like yourself - nor is it tens of thousands of perpetually-splintering sects all teaching different doctrines. And it certainly isn't...

Nice dodge . . .

Certainly NOT the pharisees because they rejected Christ. Unfortunately for YOU and most Protestants who have been spoonfed the fallacy that ALL tradition is wrong - you have misinterpreted this passage. I kn you thought that this was a "trick question" - but it's just a failure on your part to...

That last verse refutes everything you said prior to it. And not ONE of you has been able to answer why Simon was called "Cephas" by Paul in his letters. Why is he called "Peter"?? The answer is in Matt. 16:18 . . . You believe Peter is not the "Rock" Jesus spoke of but that the Rock refers...

It's been a semantics issue since you rejected the fact the there were Jewish and Gentile Christians in the Early Church.

Priceless but true.

And that's fine. Just don't say that you "accept" the Deuterocanonicals as Scripture when you keep referring to them as "Apocrypha". MOST Protestants are honest about their rejection of these Books, unlike you . . .

John 3:3 Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are BORN AGAIN. Just sayin' . . .