Search results

The sad truth - for YOU at least - is that you don't have a clue as to how your sect began. Allow me to educate you . . . In 1979 James and Deborah Green entered their "prayer closet" and claim that God was in there and spoke to them about assembling an "Army". The self-proclaimed "Generals"...

No - you didn't agree with me. You cannot agree that these Books are Scripture when you continue to refer to them as "Apocrypha". Apocryphal works by definition are NON-INSPIRED - so you're simply dancing around the question. What is the difference between "Led" by God and "Inspired" by God...

Actually - it doesn't., although it is based on the word Biblios. And the list of Books (Canon) that comprise the Bible isn't in the Bible - so, by YOUR standards it's "foolishness". And, I already qualified it by saying that GOD'S logic is inerrant. And that is nothing more than...

"Self-Proclaimed"? Not at all. I am a member of the Body of Christ (1 Cor. 12, Col. 1:18), which is the pillar and foundation of truth and the fullness of Christ (Eph. 1:22-23).

Wrong. Read post #62.

Wrong. In Acts 9:4-5, Jesus identifies His very SELF with His Church: Acts 9:4-5 He fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting ME?" He said, "Who are you, sir?" The reply came, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. Notice that Jesus DOESN’T...

By calling them "Apocrypha", you are denying their status as inspired. It would be like calling the Constitution of the United States a mere opinion and not the law of the land. Your answer is evasive and incomplete, but I'm not surprised. I've never received a straight answer to this question...

In CHRIST. However, if a person is a Mexican or African or Indian - they are that on this earth. The Apostles were Jewish and converts like Cornelius were Gentiles - and no amount of your signature denial can change that.

This answers one giant cop-out. Hermeneutics is just the art and science of Biblical interpretation - your rejection of the word, notwithstanding. Don't forget - "Bible" isn't in the bible either . . . It's only "foolishness" because you can't argue with the logic behind it. This is just...

Soooo, the Apostles weren't Jewish?? Cornelius wasn't a Gentile?? What Bible are YOU reading??

I couldn't care less if you claim victory. My job here is to expose people like you - and I HAVE. The mere fact that I presented 35 verses that prove the Trinity - several pages ago - and YOU have failed to address them means that YOU lose. Every person reading this can see that . . .

No - let's start with what YOU said. YOU misrepresented this verse by saying that Jesus WAS the right hand. The verse doesn't say that. It says that Jesus is STANDING AT the right hand of God. Try being honest for a change . . .

With God - ALL things are possible. Stop thinking like a flawed human being and try thinking like a person of faith.

Like I said - I have answered question after question after question - and YOU have answered nothing. It's YOUR turn now . . .

WRONG, as always. #1 - First of all - Stephen saw Jesus STANDING AT the right hand of God #2 - Read closely . . . Acts 22:14 "Then he said: 'The God of our ancestors has chosen you to know his will and to see the Righteous One and to hear words from his mouth. In other words, Einstein -...

I have done nothing BUT answer your questions. Now, it's time to start answering mine. When you can do that - I will answer more of yours.

One of the most basic rules of hermeneutics is the following: a. When Jesus addressed the Apostles and inner circle - He was addressing the Leaders of His Church. b. When Jesus addressed the crowds - He was addressing ALL of us. Luke 10: 16, Jesus addressed the "72". We know from the Early...

The Apostles were Jewish Christians. Cornelius was a Gentile Christian. Don't you ever tire being proven wrong?

I didn't say "33,000". I said TENS of thousands.

No, you didn't because by calling them "Apocrypha" means that you don't consider them to be inspired Scripture. My question is: Do you accept them as inspired Scripture? If not, why?