Search results

Back in post #297 - I overwhelmed you with Scripture regarding the reality of the Holy Trinity. So far - you haven't been able to disprove or rationalize away ONE single verse - although you keep impotently claiming victory. "Oneness", "Diversified Oneness", or "Super-Duper Onenes" - it ALL...

Yes, the heretic Sabellius also made the same mistake. Suffering from the same ignorant pride - it's not surprising to see how blind YOU are as well . . .

How old are you?? Because you certainly don’t seem to be able to reason like an adult. James and John were writing the truth under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. ALL Scripture is God-breathed (2 Tim. 3:16). The Holy Spirit inspired them to write about the Advocacy of ALL Christians – not...

Soooo, YOU believe Jesus was talking about amniotic fluid?? This makes absolutely NO sense in the context of His conversation with Nicodemus: John 3:3-5 Jesus answered and said to him, “Amen, amen, I say to you, no one can see the kingdom of God without being born from above.” Nicodemus said to...

So, then you disagree with Jesus' transfer of Authority to His Church in Matt. 16:18-19, Matt. 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 16:12-15, and John 20:21-23?? Exactly which part of those verses do you have a problem with? Written, compiled and declared canonical by the Catholic Church. HOWEVER, for...

Your heretical aberrations aside - I already pointed out to you that not only is Jesus an Advocate - but the Holy Spirit is also an Advocate (John 14:16) - as well as ALL Christians (James 5:16, 1 John 5:16). Like I said before - don't just quote the Scriptures. LEARN what they mean . . .

Ummm, speaking of "ignorant" - nobody was claiming that James and John were part of the Trinity, Einstein. However - what they wrote in the NT is God-breathed truth (2 Tim. 3:16-17) - and they wrote about out intercession for one another. The Holy Spirit is not the only "advocate" in this sens...

Soooo - what do YOU think Jesus meant by "water" in John 3:5?

Huh?? Protos means "first". Prototype means the first model. Jesus' Baptism was the prototype (model) for all future Christian Baptism.

He said Water AND Spirit.

Nice try – but no cigar. Just because the titles are used in this verse does NOT meant they aren’t three separate and distinct Persons. When you speak about the President, Vice President and Secretary of State – you are speaking about three distinct persons without using their names. This is...

That's not true. There IS a requirement that you submit to the Authority of Christ's Church (Matt. 16:18-19, Matt. 18:15-18, Luke 10:16, John 16:12-15, John 20:21-23). Like it or not - and most non-Catholics refuse to admit it - the Canon of the NT was written, compiled and declared by the...

Then I'm not sure what your point was.

The Baptism of Jesus was the prototype for Baptismal Regeneration. BOTH elements were present: 1. Water 2. The Holy Spirit (in the form of a dove). ONE Baptism (Eph. 4-5). - with both elements (Matt. 3:16).

And who is making that claim? I simply showed 2 passages in Scripture that mandate water Baptism. So far - you haven't refuted that.

Huh?? All THREE Persons of the Trinity are named in this verse. This is preposterous. The Holy Spirit not allowed to be an advocate because Jesus is one?? An "Advocate" is simply a HELPER. We are ALL called upon to be advocates (intercessors) for each other (James 5:16, 1 John 5:16). Try...

These are basic tenets of Christianity and Judaism. Don't forget - these 2 commands from Jesus encompass the 10 Commandments. As for the Trinity - without the revelation of the nature of the Godhead, we cannot have Christianity. The entire basis if Christianity begins with the Trinity.

Huh?? Both passages prove the necessity of Water Baptism.

Not really sure what you mean, but it sounds like relativism - "your truth vs. my truth". Truth is truth - no matter who believes it. And it DOES need to be defended when people are actively working to hide it behind a veil of lies or discredit it before people who don't know any better. It's...

Your whole premise is that the truth doesn't need defending - but Scripture doesn't agree with that position.