Search results

No - just an exposer of lies. Everybody has a right to hear the truth. I'm just pulling the weeds and clearing the field so they can seek the truth - without wading waist deep in the manure you and your anti-Catholic buddies are spreading.

And this is precisely what I'm talking about. You are probably the ONLY one here who thinks mjrhealth has the patience of a "saint". Any honest Protestant here - and there ARE a small number - can see right through his lies. For you to support his easily-debunked filth is just as shameful as...

Soooo, YOUR problem is with priestly vestments?? Rev. 1:13, 4:4, 6:11, 7:9, 15:6, 19:13-14 tells us about priests wearing special vestments in the heavenly liturgy. Do you have the same problem with Protestant ministers wearing vestments or a collar?? Talk about being nit-picky and divisive...

That's funny - because in MY Bible - Jesus called people like YOU, "Hypocrites" . . .

Just like you can't stop lying . . .

WE don't clothe ourselves in anything from God. HE clothes us. Incidentally - you DID blow me off for over a dozen exchanges because you knew you had no valid answer for this nonsense.

And I have learned that she supports anti-Catholic lies and the people who spew them - but she hates when those lies are exposed. I honestly don't know what to think about her. All I can do is pray for people like that.

And this has absolutely nothing to do with your online cult, "aggressivechristianity.net." Those wackos pervert the Scriptures like nobody else - and YOU swallow every morsel of it.

And your angry response has absolutely nothing to do with the linguistic evidence I presented. You never even addressed it. Gee - I wonder why . . .

And the fact remains that YOU adhere to the Catholic canon of the New Testament. WHY is that?? We wrote it. We compiled it. We declared the Canon - ALL under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

That's funny - I wasn't responding to you. I was responding to a post by "Truth". Besides - I thought you had me on "ignore" . . .

In "those days", the Catholic Church was a title - not a mere description. Allow me to educate you in the Greek . . . In the 2nd century document, The Martyrdom of Polycarp, the term, "Catholic Church" is used. The Catholic Church gets its name from the GREEK for “according to the whole” and...

Then your statement is even more asinine that I previously thought. How do WE, as human beings put a robe of righteousness on another human being?? We don't clothe ourselves, Einstein - GOD does. And to think it took well over a dozen attempts to get that out of you . . .

Again - I would LOVE to see where you got this unsubstantiated rubbish. I look forward to reading your researched response.

Sure. What position are YOU going to take? Certainly not the Catholic position . . .

A LOT of things. We have talked about the Catholic Church. We have talked about Protestants. We have talked about the Pope. Now - can you just A*N*S*W*E*R the question?

Ahhhh, now I see. You've lost the argument and now you're living in denial. Pray for faith instead.

YOUR asinine statement: "And all who are saved shall wear the robes of righteousness. But you have not given robes to all, but to ONE." Neither paragraph 4 NOR 5 answers who this "ONE" is.

And it not only says that we're BORN in sin - but, that we're CONCEIVED in it . . . - Psalm 51:5 says that ALL of us come into the world as sinners: “Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin my mother conceived me.” - Ephesians 2:2 states that ALL of us who are not in Christ are...

I never apologized because I'm not the one lying and misrepresenting Scripture here. Caught you in another one. Honestly - it's like shootin' fish in a barrel with you anti-Catholics . . .