Search results

Well, after about a dozen or so attempts at trying to get you to explain your moronic claim - it's painfully obvious that you stuck your foot in your mouth and can't figure how to get out of it. Consider yourself exposed. Next time you make an anti-Catholic remark - make sure you can back it...

I already did. Now, can you just answer the question?

No, it doesn't. Everybody's conversion to God is different. Only a fool would make a blanket statement implying that those at the end of their lives have a slim chance, if any, because of some predetermined condition. THAT is an asinine statement and one that is in direct opposition to the...

Sooooo, you're just going to continue with your stupid riddles instead of just answering the question I've asked about 10 times now??

See post #1029 and try to keep your confused gobbldygook out of it.

You explained nothing. Explain your statement in your OWN words: "And all who are saved shall wear the robes of righteousness. But you have not given robes to all, but to one." WHO is the "One" you are talking about?? Is that simple enough for you to understand??

No - THIS is an asinine statement - and it's YOURS: "I would not want to be a person who devoted my life to the flesh, with the expectation of converting at the last minute - the last minute has been conditioned by the flesh and will naturally follow its master." Every individual is different...

Not explicitly, no - but you implied it.

It's a good thing that Jesus disagrees with you - for the sake of the soul of the Thief on the cross . . . Yes, we SHOULD come to Christ during our life - but that doesn't negate all of the souls that have been saved in the last minutes of life.

Clearly they BOTH sinned because they were BOTH punished. Being "deceived" isn't a get out of jail free card. We are responsible for our actions.

Are you even paying attention - or do you just like to whine?? My post that YOU reported as "pure flaming" was a response to "Truth's" post #1851, where he/she posted the following anti-Catholic lies: That the Catholic Church was established by Rome and not Jesus and the Apostles That...

The fact that God is the Author of Scripture is a given - and nobody is disputing that. However - the guidance of the Holy Spirit, along with supreme earthly Authority was given to His CHURCH. It was His Church who was guided by the Holy Spirit to declare the canon of Scripture and no single...

Rubbish. Original Sin is a Biblical concept and one that we read about in the pages of Scripture: - Genesis 8:21 claims, “. . . the intent of man’s heart is evil from his youth.” - Proverbs 22:15 states, “Foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child.” - Psalm 51:5 says that ALL of us come...

And King James was around in the 4th century when the Canon was declared by the Catholic Church??? You can't be this dense. The New Testament YOU and ALL Protestants adhere to was declared by what YOU consider to be the "evil" and "apostate" Catholic Church. So, I ask you yet AGAIN: WHY do you...

Actually - it's a great source for keeping my finger on the pule of the moronic wackos who pervert the Scriptures. As I read your posts - it's really no wonder why YOU glean your answers from them . . .

Uhhhhh, no. All you have done is dodge the question. YOU made the following statement: "And all who are saved shall wear the robes of righteousness. But you have not given robes to all, but to one." I have asked you several times to explain it and all you did was give a verse of Scripture...

Your moronic comment about Jesus's severed arm aside - He showed the Apostles how to consume His flesh and drink His blood SACRAMENTALLY at the Last Supper. Also - Acts 2:46 says explicitly that they early Church met DAILY - not "3 times" a year.

This is a nonsensical and lazy response. I never said that Babylon was Jerusalem. Babylon in New Testament terms applies to pagan Rome. Peter was never in Iraq. He was crucified on Vatican Hill and buried there. He was writing from Rome. I have given you both Scriptural equivalents between...

Hmmmm . . . where is the "apology" from Protestants for the 72,000 or so Catholics killed by Henry VIII?? Why is there no "apology" for the tens of thousands of Catholics who were starved to death by Elizabeth I?? Have the Calvinist Protestants ever apologized for murdering Dutch Catholic...

That's interesting - too completely false and unsubstantiated. First of all - the onus is on YOU to tell us exactly when the Catholic Church came into being since you claim it wasn't "fully developed" in the 4th century. History is absolutely clear that the Catholic Church existed fro the very...