Search results

While ignoring how my question relates to the verse of God judging by man’s works also.

A distinction without a difference. All I said was judgment/rewards of works is what Scripture says in the verse. Taken took the thread down a long diversion. But to your point, the idea of judging/rewarding a man’s works but not the man has no application.

Both. The virus is real. The hysteria and agenda to use it for nefarious purposes is also certainly an invention. Socialism. An idea so good, it has to be mandatory.

The question of history aside, the question of who is and is not here remains debated, despite the fact that the trinity is not in the Bible. I read a great book on point called When Jesus became God by Rubenstein. The heresy in the 4th century won due to politics; the Roman emperor killed...

See below. Scripture says judgment will be based on man’s work. You’ve made so many posts to divert from this it’s hard to keep count but the post above relies on ‘many things’ as a means to deny God judges based on man’s works.

This is where Gods timing builds our virtue of patience.

I’ve already answered that several times now. You have a doctrine that supersedes God’s Word. In the verse in question, God says he’ll judge/reward people’s works. What is your point of carrying on?

So say you apart from the verse in question, which explicitly says God judges the works of people.

Interesting. In my devotional reading in Daniel ‘the king of kings’ was identified as Nebuchadnezzar. If what AJ said is total nonsense, please identify that verse in Isaiah where he was calling God a trinity?

The reason is clear. Trinitarians must create these false equivalents in order to support their doctrine. One example is to falsely assert ‘lord’ is a synonym for God. Jesus is NEVER called God Jesus but is called lord Jesus.

There ya go! Setting me up to abide by your false standards. Just because a Bible embraces ‘dynamic equivalence’ does not make it faulty. Not only do I reject your premise, I reject your pejorative use of terms.

It’s what you did. circular reasoning is When you use a conclusion as a premise to support your conclusion. It’s a bit like trying to assert something AS IF it is true by definition. P1. Birds fly south in the winter. P2. Birds are flying south. C. Therefore, it is winter because the birds are...

Yea, lest you see how one truth connects to another truth! How we judge is in some ways the same as God judges - by the actions of others.

Well, we disagree then about Circular Reasoning.

Absolutely, I judge you for your foolish ways. Knowledgeable, you assert but lacks wisdom. There are millions of people like me. To paraphrase Jefferson, “If we had to go to God only through literal translations, we wouldn’t go.”

I’ll type this slowly so you can read it easier. The thought expression translations I’ve read do not use the pejorative term you do. The idolatry of translations by people like you keep people from God. I know because I was a victim. For decades KJVism-only kept me from reading Scripture. I...

Interesting question. I never thought of equating something as false if it is not from God. For instance, many Eastern religions like Taoism and Buddhism are not false even though they godless. Buddhism is essentially an expansion of the 10th Commandment. The prohibition against coveting is not...

Wow. Do YOU realize I was making an analogy to the Scripture verse that says people will be judged/rewarded by their works? The whole idea of God knowing our hearts is besides 2 points: (1), the verse about being judged based on our works; and (2). that we are saved by grace not what is in our...

Sad to hear. What I’ve seen is people put their doctrine ahead of the actual word of God. I recall one poster who wrote she is not even going to look at the Biblical support as she does not believe it. Huh?

Even to the point of claiming it is the central message of the Bible AND ones salvation depends on violating the 1C. Trouble is, Gods word saves us from such heresies as their claims are not found once in 66 books.