Search results

To say that the Jews NEVER accepted the Deuterocanonical Books as Scripture is a complete and total LIE. The 7 Deuterocanonical Books were part of the OPEN Jewish Canon that existed prior to and after the life of Christ. They were only ejected after Jesus walked the earth because of the...

Spoken like a true Biblical anarchist. NEVER form your doctrines on the exception. The obedience of Baptism is the NORM (Mark 16:16). The thief on the cross was kind of "busy" at the time and didn't have the opportunity to get baptized. Jesus recognized this and saved him anyway. Had he lived...

Whoever handed it down. Sacred Tradition didn't just pop up out of thin air. It was handed down from the Apostles. Paul describes this and how it is ON PAR with Scripture (2 Thess. 2:15). Apparently, you didn't R*E*A*D my last post - so I'll make it simple enough for a child to understand...

1. That which is doctrinal and handed down verbally. 2. Sacred Tradition doesn't change, modify or abandon anything. 3. Sacred Tradition is necessary because NOT everything was written down in Scripture. The Bible is very clear about that (John 21:25, 2 Thess. 2:15). For example - how...

And the entire false teaching of a Pre-Tribulation "Rapture" is a man made invention that is only about 180 years old. Look up "John Nelson Darby" to find out where your false doctrine came from. This was never taught in the 1800 years of Christianity before Darby . . .

WRONG. Only to those who have faith and obey. Faith is FAR more than simply "believing". As I have shown you many times now - even the DEMONS believe (James 2:19). Demons don't have faith, which requires obedience. Not for everyone . . . Matt. 7:21-23 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord...

First of all - there is no such thing as the "Roman Church" - so ALL of your arguments go right down the toilet. If you want to debate whether the Catholic Church's teachings are anti-Biblical - that is a completely different kettle of fish. Secondly - your grasp on Tradition is moronic, to say...

We are saved by the blood of Christ. Scripture NEVER prescribes "accepting" Him as "personal Lord and Savior". Jesus said that a person must be BAPTIZED and believe (Mark 16:16) to be saved. This requires obedience of faith - NOT just belief. As for using Rom. 10:9-10 as your criteria for...

Noah and his family were NOT taken away - they were Left Behind to repopulate the earth. No matter how much you try to put a spin on this - these are the Biblical facts . . .

Stay on topic . . .

What are you talking about?? WHO said that Job's salvation was taken away?? I was showing you that the Bible speaks of people dying as being "taken away" - just like those who died in the Flood when Noah and his family were "Left Behind". Stay with the conversation - or get out of the way . . .

Scripture never makes this claim - so why do YOU?? Why don't you post the 4 verses that PRECEDE Rev. 5 so we can see the CONTEXT?? You won't post them because they prove you wrong. Rev. 5:1-5 “To the angel[a] of the church in Sardis write: These are the words of him who holds the seven...

There is not one Sacred Tradition that "trumps" Scripture - or vice versa. You lose because you can't provide one, single example. Oh, and all of your "Romanist" manure simply illustrates your moronically immature need to insult in the face of ZERO evidence.

What did Job say after his children had been killed? Job 1:21 And said, Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the Lord gave, and the Lord hath TAKEN AWAY; blessed be the name of the Lord.

YOU'VE been saying all along that all you have to do is "believe" to overcome. NOW, you're changing your tune and saying that you have to "accept Jesus as your Savior" - which is NOT in the Bible, by the way. Overcoming in Rev. 3:5 requires FAR more than just believing - it requires obedience...

And this is a truly idiotic response. Open your Bible and show me where the word "Incarnation" is found. Do a Biblehub search . . . While you're at it - show me where the Bible speaks of "Accepting" Jesus as "Personal Lord and Savior". Can you find the words"Total Depravity", Eternal Security...

Your rejection of Jesus is the rejection of the Word of God. Jesus is the Word (John 1:1). You have thus far claimed that simply "believing" in God is what Rev. 3:5 refers to as "overcoming." You are DEAD wrong because you cherry-pick the Scriptures instead of reading them in CONTEXT. The...

I didn't "identify" him with anything. I simply pointed out an observation about his rejection of the Word of God.

The quotes from the Catechism you presented did nothing but support my argument all along. Scripture itself puts Sacred Tradition ON PAR with Scripture (2 Thess. 2:15) - whether YOU like it or not. As for Sacred Tradition "trumping" Scripture - it can't - and neither can Scripture "trump"...

An anti-Catholic is a cowardly person who resorts to spinning lies and fairy tales about the Catholic Church because he doesn't have any real evidence to go from. He doesn't have the foggiest idea about what the Church actually teaches but he continues to spew out lie after lie as if he did. By...