Search results

Really? Show me HOW I'm taking them out of context. Anyway - I don't preach a doctrine of "works" salvation and neither does the Church.

And, as I have proven with Scripture - NOBODY can separate us from God - except for ourselves . . . Matt. 7:19-23, Matt. 10:22, Matt. 24:13, Matt. 25:31–46, John 15:1-6, Rom. 11:22, 1 Cor. 9:27, 1 Cor. 4:4, 1 Tim. 4:1, Heb. 3:6, Heb. 3:12-14, Heb 6:4-6, Heb. 10:26-27, 2 Pet.r 3:17, 1 John 2:24...

Can't argue with the Word of God . . .

And the Scriptures are correct: NOTHING or NOBODY can separate us from the love of God - except ourselves . . . Matt. 7:19-23, Matt. 10:22, Matt. 24:13, Matt. 25:31–46, John 15:1-6, Rom. 11:22, 1 Cor. 9:27, 1 Cor. 4:4, 1 Tim. 4:1, Heb. 3:6, Heb. 3:12-14, Heb 6:4-6, Heb. 10:26-27, 2 Pet.r 3:17...

I don't "hate" you or anybody else. I pity you and everybody else who gets seduced into these worldly cults like aggressivechristianity.net. Anyway - you're being a Navy man has nothing to do with your Scriptural ignorance. However, it DOES make me wonder how you could be in the armed services...

No - you're part of a bizarre cult that was established in 1980 by a couple who refer to themselves as "Generals". Anybody who wants to learn more about this weird sect can learn about them and their drones at aggressivechristianity.net. It'll give you a better understanding of where mrhealth...

And there is only ONE Church (Matt. 16:18, John 17:21-23). This is a fact that they don't seem to understand.

And ALL of the following passages speak to the possibility of LOSING our salvation if we do not remain faithful: Romans 11:22 “See, then, the kindness and severity of God: severity toward those who fell, but God's kindness to you, provided you REMAIN in his kindness; otherwise you to will be...

In other words - you have absolutely no explanation why this fallacy wasn't taught for 1800 years. Pretty much what I thought. You're a Darby-ist. Good luck with that . . .

I hope so.. I can't wait to see my Lord - and His mother . . .

Uhhh, no, you didn't answer my question. Here it is again: Why was this never taught for almost 1900 years in ALL of Christianity? I'll word it differently, to make it easier: After the Bible was written - why was this never taught for almost 1900 years in ALL of Christianity? You're...

First of all - you never answered my question: Why was this never taught for almost 1900 years in ALL of Christianity? Secondly - where does 1 Thess. 4:17 speak of a Pre-Tribulation "Rapture." This is talking about the 2nd Coming of Christ.

Ummmmm, first of all – I never said or implied that God was a “rapist.” I simply stated that YOUR view of Him makes Him a rapist. This discussion is being constantly marred by your complete inability to be truthful. Stop being dishonest and start practicing what you preach. Augustine’s views...

None of what we've been discussing is a "foolish" controversy. It's only "foolish" when you have no answer . . .

No - the Premillennial "Rapture" believe is a perversion of what Paul and John wrote. If you do a rudimentary study on this false doctrine - you will see that it was never taught by ANY arm of Christianity until John Nelson Darby in the 19th century. Why was this never taught for almost 1900...

Uhhhh . . . yeah. Explain why the Church never taught about the ridiculous idea of a Premillennial "Rapture" for almost 2000 years until John Nelson Darby began to teach it in the 1830's. Explain to me why this was not only NOT taught by the Catholic Church but by the Fathers of the Protestant...

So, in your opinion, the ONE true Church established by Jesus was AggressiveChristianity.net, founded in 1980 by James and Deborah Green?? That is a looney claim . . . The ONLY Church that can trace itself back to the Apostles in an UNBROKEN line of succession is the Catholic Church. Not ONE...

Translation: "I have no idea how to respond to the truth you have presented - so I'll attack your method of presentation instead." Good for you . . .

When you ask someone down here to "pray" for you to God, that is not you praying to them. That is you asking them. You are ignoring the second definition in each definition of the intransitive verb when it comes to how praying applies to deity. I have underlined it for you. People use the...

I don't think you're "misunderstanding" anything. I think you're just being dishonest. First of all - telling somebody that what they present in a debate is dishonest or moronic is not "name-calling". It would be name-calling If I referred to the PERSON as a "moronn" or a "Liar". I haven't...