Search results

Might want to think about this: 1 Kings 11:28-36 28 And the man Jeroboam was a mighty man of valour: and Solomon seeing the young man that he was industrious, he made him ruler over all the charge of the house of Joseph. 29 And it came to pass at that time when Jeroboam went out of Jerusalem...

The Pre-trib Rapture doctors are at it again. They tried to twist what the Pseudo-Ephraem text actually states, and it is definitely NOT about some pre-trib rapture: "Nation will rise up against nation, And kingdom against kingdom. Lawlessness will be sovereign on earth And the defiled will...

That's an abosolutely incorrect statement. Apostle Paul was a scholar of God's Holy Writ, having been learned under the best Hebrew scholar of his day, Gamaliel. So Paul was not teaching them from an oral tradition, because The Gospel which Jesus revealed to Paul was also actually written in...

Not going to happen. We have no king or queen in the U.S.

Sorry, but you have just lost it.

You said it (in red), I didn't. What I said still stands. They were called bishops in Peter's era, not popes. And the office of the one you call the Pope was a "pope of popes" office created around the 3rd century A.D. So in reality, the "Pope" has no more authority than any other brother in...

That's where you are wrong, because Apostle Paul approved of those at Berea verifying for themselves in The Word of God, that means God's Holy Writ is to be available in the hands of ALL believing Christians, and this is why after King James made The Bible available to his English speaking...

This matter isn't about winning an argument. It's about declaring God's Truth in His Word so all brethren may be edified. It is not done for self.

It's not irrelevant at all. I WILL NOT KISS THE HAND OF A POPE. I wouldn't kiss the hand of the Queen of England either. I have no intention of meeting her either. And if I did, I'm sure she would be standing on the same level, and not high up on throne like the pope who actually has NO...

Nah, they weren't called popes, they were called 'bishops', as per NT doctrine. Your Catholic Church system keeps back-labeling anyone ordained by Peter and later as popes when the office of a pope didn't even exist yet.

Like Jesus said to the unbelieving Jews in John 8... John 8:56 56 "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day: and he saw it, and was glad." KJV Jesus appeared to Abraham in the Old Testament as the Angel of The Lord, and as Melchisedec. You also need to study Hebrews 11 more carefully, and...

You still don't get it. The "image of the earthy" is about a flesh body. The "image of the heavenly" is about a spiritual body. BOTH are the outward appearance of man, which is the form that originated from God's Own Image Likeness. I showed you Scripture of where those in the flesh saw angels...

The office of "pope of popes" didn't even begin until the 3rd century A.D. So you can't refer to "The Pope" as successor to Peter, for that is a falsehood. The many popes established between Rome and Byzantine vied for power over each other, so a "pope of popes" office was created.

Jesus Christ appeared to Abraham in Genesis 18. Jesus was one of the "three men" that Abraham looked up and they were suddenly right next to him. Just because you don't find the name Jesus in the OT Books doesn't mean He didn't then exist (which is another Jewish failure to understand...

Watch the video I posted and you will see proof of false manifestations that some in the Church claim is from The Holy Spirit. One of the strongest proofs those kind of manifestations are not of The Holy Spirit is because those of other... religions that don't preach Christ are doing them too...

Don't be silly, those subject to him do... bow to him, and... kiss his hand, as if he were Jesus Christ. And isn't that one of your doctrines, that the pope is the direct representative of Jesus Christ here on earth?

Oh, and here's one for ya... Ex 15:3 3 The LORD is a man of war: the LORD is His name. KJV How is it that Moses referred to our Heavenly Father with that word for "man", which is iysh in the Hebrew? Simple. It's because The LORD (YHVH) has the outward appearance of man, it originated with Him.

It's the other way around bud. You don't know what the simplicity of God's Word teaches about His Image Likeness being that of the form of man; it originated from Him in the Heavenly and not with Adam's flesh. The angels also have the image likeness form of man, which is what God's Word attests...

You have an even bigger problem in your understanding then, because the ONLY Gospel there is is The Gospel of Jesus Christ. And no, you can't go quoting phrases like "the gospel of the kingdom" and omit Jesus Christ from that either, since that's the same Gospel of Jesus Christ too, just...

I already showed you that Paul was talking about known languages of the world in 1 Cor.12 thru 14. That's why he gave the example of someone speaking another language no one could interpret being as a barbarian, meaning a foreigner: 1 Cor 14:10-11 10 There are, it may be, so many kinds of...