Search results

Yes, Scripture that has nothing to do with the conversation. Just stick to the topic. . .

And in context, Jesus was talking about the PHARISEES, Einstein. Then again, maybe He was referring the the "Generals" in your little cult, "aggressivechristianity.net" . . .

WRONG. Contrary to what YOU were taught by the 180 year old false Millennial doctrines - Jesus comes ONE more time - not twice. This pre-Tribulation "Rapture theology" is a man made invention of John Nelson Darby in the 1830's. NOWHERE does the bible speak of the Church being pulled off of the...

This is how we know . . . The Synod of Rome (382) is where the canon was first formally identified. It was confirmed at the Synod of Hippo eleven years later (393). At the Council (or Synod) of Carthage (397), it was yet again confirmed. The bishops wrote at the end of their document, "But...

Speaking in gibberish and non sequiturs gain, I see . . .

First of all - I don't even know what the "Roman Church" is. I belong to the Catholic Church., which is the guardian of the Holy Deposit of faith (2 Tim 1:13-14). Secondly - I never said that "everyone" will die. At the 2nd Coming, Christ will judge the living AND the Dead (2 Timothy 4:1, 1...

The Bible didn’t even exist completely until the end of the 4th century when the Canon was declared by the Catholic Church. Before that – there were MANY Books that were considered to be inspired and were read from pulpits during that time. The Bible is not the final Authority for Christians –...

You last line: "Knowlege of the Scriptures is progressive. Not contradictory, but progressive. The Jews refuse to believe Jesus Christ is found in their Scripture." THAT'S your answer to my question about why this Millennial nonsense wasn't taught until 180 years ago?? Because knowledge of...

Yes, Darby is the Father of '"Rapture Theology". it's funny - when you ask a Rapturist about why the so-called "Reformers" didn't teach this and why has it only been taught since the 1830s - they can never answer that question. It's like Kryptonite to them . . .

There are no "Sheep Nations" or "Goat Nations". there are simply sheep and goats, figuratively, which refers to individuals. I noticed you completely ran from my questions at the end of the last post - so I'll post them again: As for Millennialism - WHY wasn't it taught until the 1830s?? Can...

And this entire post is yet another sad example of your gibberish and nonsensical ranting. Try sticking to the TOPIC. It makes for a more interesting and edifying conversation.

Actually - you walked away from Christ and His Church because you didn't understand it and was too lazy to learn about it. Instead, you joined the heresy of the little "Generals" over at "aggressivechristianioty.net" . . .

Both 1 Cor. 15:27-27 and Rev. 4 & 5 show Jesus reigning in Heaven with the Father and the Holy Spirit. For you yo deny this is simply, well - denial. The text is crystal clear. As for the who and where in regards to the Judgments - I don't know how much clearer I can be. You're just playing...

That's just it - none of your tangential rants illuminate anything. They're simply off-topic diatribes that fade into gibberish. Just stick to the topic.

A dialogue is a conversation. Just stick to the topic instead of going off on tangents and you might be able to have an intelligent conversation.

Just for the record - I was pointing to the fact that even though your charge was incorrect - your intention to call Catholics idolators because we worship the Eucharist was a correct usage of the term "Idol". Too many people on this forum throw that word around ignorantly because they accuse...

Explain to me what a "Christian" is - if you can . . .

Jesus broke bread and transformed it into His Body and gave it to the Apostles. He sis the same thing with the wine. This was done SACRAMENTALLY - not literally. As Catholic, we don't eat actual human flesh at Communion - we eat the glorified Body of our Lord as commanded by HIM. When Jesus...

YOU are an anti-Catholic because you resort to lying when trying to make your points. One who simply disagrees with Catholic teaching is not an anti-Catholic.

IF you were a Catholic - you were an extremely ignorant one - and THAT'S why you left. You've certainly shown your ignorance on this forum. That is always the case with ex-Catholics . . .