Search results

So, you couldn't answer the questions - is that it?? Here they are again: 1. WHO declared the Protestant Canon of Scripture? 2. WHO had the Authority to do so? Somthin' tells me you'll dance around it again on your next response . . .

Translation: "I don't have any Biblical evidence for the claims I've made and I have absolutely no way to defend my position anymore." Pretty much what I thought. You spew out a lot of unsubstantiated rubbish but you can't back it up with Scripture or understand the linguistic implications...

WOW - I marvel at the complete ignorance of some people. You didn't even bother to do your homework before writing this . . . First of all - get your story on the Trinity right because you're WAY off. Secondly, the Youtube links are absurd - especially the one about the "Reptile Jesus"...

I'm not using this to promote anything but the truth. The fact remains unequivocally that the Catholic Church declared the Canon of Scripture in the 4th century - and ALL Protestant versions are based on that one. NONE of you has been able to tell me: 1. WHO declared the Protestant Canon of...

The unpardonable sin is final impenitence. You can only be guilty of it if you die in that state. Until then - you have the opportunity to repent. I wouldn't wait too long, though.

That doe't make any sense whatsoever. The hosts in Heaven don't reject God. And NOT everybody who opposes the Church is a Protestant. Only CHRISTIANS who oppose the Church are Protestant. Anyway - Jesus IS God, so what's your point??

Ummmm, first of all - as i explained earlier, "The Didache" is "The Teachings of the Twelve Apostles". "Didache" is not a person. Secondly, I already destroyed your notion that just because something is not in the Bible - that is is not truth. "Incarnation" is not in the Bible - but it is a...

There's nothing sinister about the Catholic definition of a Protestant. A Protestant is simply a non-Catholic Christian. A Christian, by definition is one who is a follower of Christ who has been baptized in the Trinitarian formula.

Okay, fair enough. Can you tell me WHO declared the Protestant Canon of Scripture and WHO had the Authority to do so? this should be easy for ANY Protestant to answer . . .

WRONG. Paul doesn't "always" preface what the OT says with "it is written" or something similar. We see evidence of this in 2 Cor. 13:1-2, where he alludes directly to Deut. 17:6 when he speaks of the necessity of the testimony of 2 witnesses. it is abundantly clear to any honest person that...

Hmmmm, for a person who likes to argue about what the Bible says - your ignorance of Scripture is astounding. Here's a little lesson for you: When in doubt - always go to the original language. In the Greek, the word used in Acts 8:38 to describe the disappearance of Philip is ηαρπαζο...

Actually - in Protestantism, there is almost 50,000 versions of the "truth" . . .

Do you even understand what "apocryphal" means?? Doesn't sound like you do . . . As for the "Armor of God" reference in Eph. 6:13-17, it is abundantly clear that Paul lifted this from Wisdom 5:17-20. The only explanation would be that the whole comparison is simply a "coincidence". Only a...

Uhhh, no - you didn't provide Scripture to counter the teaching from the Didache. You also didn't show me where the list of Protestant teachings are in Scripture - namely: "Altar calls"?? Christian "Infant Dedications"?? The "Sinner's prayer"?? Accepting Jesus Christ as "Personal Lord and...

For your claims to have ANY merit - you need to show me where the Scriptures tell us that everything that is NOT in Scripture is "fiction". Can you show me where the Bible talks about: "Altar calls"?? Christian "Infant Dedications"?? The "Sinner's prayer"?? Accepting Jesus Christ as "Personal...

REALLY?? First of all - the Deuterocanonical Books are not "Apocryphal. BUT, as to your false claim that apocryphal works were NOT mentioned in the NT - turn your Bible to Colossians 4:16. Here, we read about Paul's Letter to the Laodiceans - which is NOT in Scripture. While you're at it -...

1 Cor. 15:6 tells us on NO uncertain terms that Jesus appeared to over FIVE HUNDRED people at the same time - not just to the Twelve. As for walking through walls and dematerializing - Jesus is GOD as well as man. He has the ability to do WHATEVER He wills. Anyway, we read in Acts 8:39, where...

Ummm, time for an English lesson: hy·per·bo·le hīˈpərbəlē noun 1. exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally. synonyms: exaggeration, overstatement, magnification, embroidery, embellishment, excess, overkill, rhetoric; “Hyperbole” simply means to exaggerate. Jesus uses...

Sorry - but that is nothing but relativism. "MY" truth vs. "YOUR" truth. Truth doesn't depend on the hearer. It is true regardless of who hears it.

Another bad argument. To say that Jesus' glorified body is NOT physical is to deny the Scriptures that illustrate plainly that he ATE with his disciples (Luke 24:42-43). A purely spiritual being doe not eat nor does is have any need of food.