Search results

All great questions that he will surely either ignore completely or won't address specifically. Edit: Seeing his response, I was right.

You are dishonest by acting as if John also wrote about the Olivet Discourse, which he clearly did not. That is as dishonest as it gets. LOL. Luke 21:5 And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said, You are trying to tell me that when they "spake...

So, I guess you believe that mystery Babylon is a human woman, too? Revelation 17:5 And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon The Great, The Mother Of Harlots And Abominations Of The Earth.

Yet another robotic response from you where you don't address anything I said. I'm done with you. I'd rather talk to human beings.

You have done that yourself many times, so you're not one to talk about this. Just worry about your own self and what you will say on Judgment Day to explain your own extreme rudeness and nastiness. This is a total cop out. And scripture makes it clear why He wanted them. Why would that not be...

Where is that indicated at all in Luke 21? It's clearly the temple buildings standing at that time that were being talked about in the Olivet Discourse and not the Lord's body. John didn't record the Olivet Discourse. You are being very dishonest here with the text in the Olivet Discourse.

Why do you worship the KJV Bible translators? You should only worship God. I think the KJV is a good translation, but it is not perfect. For example, look at these passages: Matthew 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of...

Great point! Which won't be acknowledged by those who insist that the beast is a man, of course. But, it should make them think.

Luke 21:5 And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and gifts, he said, What temple is this verse referring to? The physical temple that was standing at that time, right? That's obvious. In response to the disciples speaking highly of the temple, Jesus said this...

The word translated as "him" there can also mean "it" and is translated as "it" in other translations, so you're not proving anything here. Daniel 7:23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole...

Okay, it's very clear now. I don't have to wonder anymore. You are a robot. Your repetitive auto responses give you away.

Do you believe the following is not yet fulfilled (not including the times of the Gentiles)? Luke 21:20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. 21 Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the...

I don't want to have to guess as to how exactly you think Genesis 12-17 supports your view. Is it too much trouble for you to quote scripture and highlight the parts that you think support your view? You mean a day is as a thousand years (you said "year")? That has absolutely nothing to do with...

Good grief. I had already told you the same things several times before and you're just now understanding what I believe? Try to read my posts more carefully from now on and then it might not take you so long to figure out what I actually believe. Apparently, you define a partial preterist as...

I agree. This new old covenant that they believe in is simply not taught anywhere in scripture. Nowhere does it indicate that the new covenant will one day be replaced by a newer covenant that resembles the old covenant with its animal sacrifices. Simple as that.

Think about what the beast represents. Revelation 13:8 indicates that literally all whose names are not in the book of life worship the beast. Do you understand how nonsensical it is to think that literally every unbeliever would one day worship one man? That's impossible and unreasonable to...

And you responded saying you gave Revelation 20, but what I was saying was that you didn't offer any scripture to support your interpretation of Revelation 20. So, I obviously wasn't saying you didn't use any scripture at all, even including Revelation 20. I don't need to apologize for anything...

Agree. Notice that no one who believes in future animal sacrifices is able to explain why they would be reinstated. That is very telling. Why believe in something that you can't even back up with scripture? And why believe in something that blatantly contradicts scripture like Hebrews 8-10? It...

You are once again misapplying Old Testament scripture as you do very frequently. Why do you never care if your interpretation of Old Testament scripture is supported by New Testament scripture or not? Hebrews 10:5 Therefore, when Christ came into the world, he said: “Sacrifice and offering...

No, it isn't that simple. In order for a temple to be considered "the temple of God" it has to be a temple that God Himself would consider His temple. But, that is not the case in this scenario you believe in. It would be a temple of Satan instead since God would not approve of this future...