Search results

Great point. Two basic questions: Do you really want to know or just use the info as a weapon? Why do you want to know private information about another person? I must have miscommunicated. The host rejected the idea to simply say it is none of your business.

Someone told me Jesus hardly ever answered yes or no questions, yes or no. Sometimes he answered a question with a question. I’m inclined to respond with, “That’s really none of your business, is it?” Thoughts?

Projecting trinitarianism 100%.

You are on quite the self-righteous mission. It exposes everything about you! I have already corrected you at post #3. Your initial foray into this topic is wrong. When you start off wrong, it is hard to get right. You should not think you will convince anyone. Romans 14:1 should guide your...

No for that is unnecessarily limiting. God chose to limit those he saved through Christ. This does not necessarily translate to Jesus limiting himself through Peter.

Yea, trinitarians make too much of their idol. Naturally, you have to resort to threats that are not Scriptural. For instance, your verse does not say anything about if you don't believe in the trinity, you cannot be saved.

This question came up on the radio on the way into work. The hosts said responding with 'none of your business' is overly aggressive. A caller said the question is rooted in fear and we should not respond to fear but simply answer the question, yes or no. The host objected to the claim the...

Operated. He did work through Peter and the Apostles. I think the Spirit of God operates through many people living today. Are you a Roman Catholic? The other day I posted Acts 3:21, which states Jesus is in heaven now and must remain there until the day of universal restoration. Someone...

Agreed. Authority is not from the RCC.

I don't know much about JW but do know unitarians do not use the term Jehovah. Why are JW often bashed on this forum? It seems to me such doctrinal differences should be guided by Romans 14:1. What do you think?

Don't you think all the sentences in Scripture that portray God and Jesus as separate beings are informative? Like in Revelations 1:1, God, in his unitarian nature, gave Jesus a revelation.

The description about their beliefs is wrong. Using their words to describe their beliefs is right.

And proudly so. To them, it is you who hold heretical beliefs about God and Christ.

Listen, it is God through Christ not Christ through Peter.

I don't believe unitarians use the term Jehovah. And I don't believe Jehovah Witnesses consider themselves unitarian's. Regarding This is the Sh'ma. The most important commandment. Do you not believe the most important commandment - confirmed by Jesus at Mark 12:29?

Which is why the RCC cannot be relied upon to properly limit their own authority. Different subject. Feel free to start another thread.

Neither does the RCC get a vote - or authority over men.

Really. It is so funny that you refer to the Bible while ignoring how Christ is the head of the church verses. Ambiguous verses supersede explicit teaching in your mind.

No, it is from my purely conceived bias once I understood and applied the 1st commandment to trinitarianism. The trinity is not in the Bible. It developed in the 4th century and only Roman power of murder, ostracization and taking property of non-trinitarians allowed the dualism to become...

theefaith cannot bring himself to face the truth that your question directs our attention. Friend, 'not impeccable' is a ways off from being evil. Moses was not impeccable for hitting the stone with his shaft. Saint Peter was not impeccable for denying Christ 3 times. However, these Patriarchs...