Search results

Thinking we are God’s is a problem we had from the beginning.

What a remarkably unaware question. People all over the world get married more than once. Few marry the same person! How in the world you connect and relate 2 sets of beings getting married is not too clear but it is funny.

Again, wrong. John 12:41 does not even have Jesus in the verse! You are so desperate to find support for your doctrine, you are projecting onto unitarian text. Another failure on your part to address the text. Ignore John 20:17 explicitly saying Jesus is going to his God. Another failure on...

Wrong. You asked you is being referred to in Isaiah. Just because you are pretending the verse supports your doctrine does not mean it does. You did not like the fact that I said the Eternal, not Jesus.

Except matt 16:18 does not say his successors.

Your point is pointless. 2 different grooms, 2 different brides. How profound is that?

Reminds me of 15 In fact, I don’t understand why I act the way I do. I don’t do what I know is right. I do the things I hate. 16 Although I don’t do what I know is right, I agree that the Law is good. Romans 7:15-16 (CEV) Emily Dickinson wrote a poem I love that includes, The Heart asks for...

The trinity is not in the Bible. You ignore the entirety of the unitarian Bible to project your trinitarian doctrine and talk AS IF there is a verse like this: The nature of God is a trinity - consisting of the Father, Son & HS - and if you do not believe this, you cannot be saved. But there is...

You wish that is what Hebrews 1:8 said! o' God means of God. Hebrews 1:8 merely quotes Psalms. Angles are of God. Doesn't make them God. What part of the 1C do you not get?

The rationalizations mount. Specifically, rationalizing inferences over explicit text. Jesus, himself, send he knew less and was not as great as God, was sent by God, only says what God tells him to say, prayed to God, raised from the dead by God and after being resurrected, the 1st words out of...

Wrong. I did refute your claims. You are again projecting. And are again denying Jesus Himself explicitly said he was going to his God in John 20:17.

It is you who has a remarkable bias, imposing your trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text. Jesus Himself said he was going to his God in John 20:17. That means nothing to you?!

There are many Christian administrators. They just don’t flow through Rome.

Resorting to lying now? Jesus is not even mentioned in the verse. The desperation is amazing. Explicit is 1 Corinthians 11:3 But there is one thing I want you to know: The head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. Who is the head of Christ? God, in...

According to the VOICE translation, which I like because it makes this explicit, the Eternal, Commander of heavenly armies, the LORD God almighty - not his Son.

No but. Request denied. Jesus alone is our sole mediator to God. Obviously, I reject RCC claims to authority over their fellow man.

In fact, most doctrines are not explicit teachings in the Bible. This is why most denominations rely on 'supporting' verses for the pre-conceived doctrine. I started an entire thread differentiating 'support' from 'explicit teachings.' As one EOC said, one can 'support' anything using the Bible...

Jesus is the head of the Church per 1 Co 11:3. It disgusts me how traditional churches seek spiritual power & authority over others. Traditional dogma is oppressive.

The trinity is not in the Bible. FACT.

Right. Not with the successors. Reading into Scripture what is not there gets RCC in trouble.