Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Dude Go study it yourself. It has Been shown multiple times here by multiple people. I am sick of games. the Greek does not say it. The Greek can be trusted no English translation is Infallible. Period
  2. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    That word there is about respect not about fearing God as a dictator.
  3. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Yep he did in all the passages I showed about not being given the spirit of fear if you teach fear you do not teach the gospel plan and simple. Because you are teaching the opposite of rest. You are teaching labor
  4. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Yawn this really gets old you keep reading me an English translation even the original KJV showed a difference when it used the Plural form of you As compared To the singular form To separate the two you can read me the English translation 100 times it will not change what peter actually said
  5. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    1. Paul spoke to gentiles not individuals that same Paul said we have NOT been given a spirit of fear but if sound mind. He also said instead of a spirit of fear a spirit of adoption where we can come to the father and call him abba with no fear Jesus told us to Come to him and he will give us...
  6. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    That’s a mistake? if it is we all need to live there n fear because nothing is gauranteed
  7. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Well the title of this thread does sort of make sense but faith without the shed blood, that does not make any sense, What would your faith be in?
  8. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Yes, in language, the gift of the spirit points only to repenting, not to baptism, they are different types of words. repent and gift of the Holy Spirit is a command and promise given to everyone be baptized unto remission of sin is a command only given to individuals. Unto remmision tells us...
  9. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Actually peter is telling them to,repent, and on account of being redeemed based on your repentance, be baptized, acts 2:39:supports that view, in that all who believed and received the gift, were baptized
  10. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Wrong it’s faith alone IN the shed blood of Jesus that saves. people who have faith in Jesus plus works, place equal faith in their works as they place in Jesus, this takes glory away fro Christ and puts it on the worker as he boasts of his work, even if the worker has no comprehension that...
  11. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Your reading a flawed inglish translation The origional did not state this,
  12. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    The rope? repent is the rope? Because acts 2:38 Says to repent and you will be given the gift of the spirit, repenting would be like a drowning person who tells the rescuer no, he does not want to be rescued, he loves where he is, he does not see his danger, and will continue to flounder...
  13. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Well Excuse me if you are unable to study thenword and the passage I gave to prove my point I gave Eph 1 and 2 because the whole chapters are paul proclaiming we were given everything by God based on hearing the word and then trusting Thenword we heard in faith and later concludes it is by...
  14. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Baptism is the NT equivalent of OT circumcision 1, they both represent being cleansed 2. They both were a command by God 3. They both were seen as initiation rites yet neither of them were a means of salvation, they were symbols to proclaim a spiritual truth of the true cleansing act (call it...
  15. Eternally Grateful

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    I was baptized. by God himself the moment of my salvation a year later, I was able to be baptized in water, if I did not survive foe that year so I could be baptized, I still would have been saved,
  16. Eternally Grateful

    Is Obedience a Condition of Salvation?

    Yep now I remember you completely and why your no longer there :(
  17. Eternally Grateful

    Is Obedience a Condition of Salvation?

    You just excused peters sin shame on you
  18. Eternally Grateful

    Is Obedience a Condition of Salvation?

    Nope Habitual sin, you forget peter got called out for sin by Paul long into his mission, if what you say is true, peter was not saved
  19. Eternally Grateful

    Is Obedience a Condition of Salvation?

    The term there means a habitual act, present ongoing sin John did not contradict himself he did not say we are deceived if we claim (present tense) to be without sinl then tell us we can co fess that sin, then tell us we can’t sin. you have John contradicting himself
  20. Eternally Grateful

    Is Obedience a Condition of Salvation?

    Like your adding one can be perfect post salvation? I did not add nothing to it, it is the context of the passage if I willfully continue in unbelief (sin) then I will remain lost