Search results

You can see that Matthew 13:47-50 is about the end of the age, right? You don't believe that Jesus will return at the end of the age? That is implied in the Olivet Discourse. Do you think He was asked 3 different questions in the Olivet Discourse (one about the timing of the destruction of the...

I couldn't care less if you do or not. I'm not closed-minded on this. I have told you, what, 4 or 5 times now, why I view it the way I do. So I put more stock into what Justin Martyr said then what you do. So be it. But, that doesn't mean I'm closed-minded. Well, I'm glad that you don't have a...

This is all assumptions on your part. Nothing more. Where else are the souls of the dead in Christ except in heaven? You are clueless. In 2 Peter 3:5-7 the scope of this event is compared directly to what happened with the flood, so I think it's a reasonable assumption that it's talking about...

The concept of us putting on immortality is clearly there in 1 Corinthians 15:50-54, so what is your problem with calling believers immortal once they put on immortality? What a ridiculous thing to complain about. Pagan nonsense? Is that what you're calling what Paul taught in 1 Corinthians...

Here comes Tim with his utter nonsense again. You are trying to say that 1 Corinthians 15:22-28 is already fulfilled, which would mean that Jesus already delivered the kingdom to the Father? Is that what you're trying to say?

Is it now? Well, then tell me how you interpret this passage: Matthew 13:47 “Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was let down into the lake and caught all kinds of fish. 48 When it was full, the fishermen pulled it up on the shore. Then they sat down and collected the good fish...

Obviously, so I can't figure out why you were talking about his final defeat in relation to his binding. At least, that's how it came across to me. That's just you. Do you represent all Amils and Premils? LOL. So, you do think you represent all Amils and Premils. Hardly. Have you read Rich R's...

And I don't care if you don't care about that. You continue to make false accusations even after being corrected. You don't seem to care about making false accusations about what others believe. Why do you use terms like that without explaining what they mean then? Especially when your...

You proved nothing, as usual. And you are completely ignoring the proof I provided to show that Jesus will be on the great white throne. You are stubborn and unteachable. When your view is clearly refuted, as I did, you won't even acknowledge it. I showed you in Daniel 7:9-10 how the description...

That isn't even what I was saying. This is futile. Who said that binding Satan had to do with casting him out of the world? Again, this is futile. You're arguing with a straw man. I'm not convinced that you would answer them in the right context, so it's pointless. I don't know, are we? You are...

Who are we saying is being replaced? No one! We promote and emphasize Jew and Gentile believers being together as one. No one is replaced. Instead, people are being joined together as one. I'm tired of this nonsense of being accused of promoting "Replacement Theology".

For crying out loud will you please start proving your claims already! You should know by now that I'm not going to just take your word for things like this. What evidence do you have to support this claim?

And you completely disregard the very next verse after 1 Peter 5:8 as if 1 Peter 5:8 is the whole story. Ugh.

Is that not what you were doing by divorcing Romans 9 from Romans 10 and 11? I'm showing enough verses to refute your claims. I don't think it's fair to expect me to go over every single verse in Romans 9. I have gone above and beyond already to back up my view. If that isn't enough for you...

Don't just say things like this to me. Explain how that proves me wrong. I'm not just going to accept your words. You obviously don't accept what John 5:22 says. Why do you just completely ignore John 5:22? Do you just pick and choose which verses you accept and throw the rest out? Daniel 7:9...

I agree. This will probably be the only thing I agree with in your entire post, but we'll see. ;) Is that what he's talking about? Let's actually look at the text to see if it says what you're saying here or something else. Hebrews 2:14 Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in...

Can you try to do that more often? I'm sometimes not sure of what it is exactly that you're trying to say. So what? No, you really shouldn't be saying that. While it was specifically addressed to seven existing churches in the Roman province of Asia at the time, the entire church can learn...

Premils like you don't. Yes, I do. The first resurrection is Christ's resurrection and we all spiritually have part in it. The other resurrection it speaks of is the resurrection of the wicked. How are you accepting what those scriptures I referenced indicate, which is that all of the righteous...

Here's something we can actually agree on. At the sixth seal, it indicates that His great day of wrath is at hand and soon to occur, but not quite yet. As you pointed out, He is still there in heaven to open the seventh seal, which proves Keraz's theory wrong since He has Jesus descending from...

Okay, so you're saying I shouldn't take anything you say at face value. Got it. And, you're implying that you think I have a "thick skull" and at the same time telling me to "try not to think the worst of someone". Okay, buddy! :rolleyes: I was only taking about that particular issue that we've...