Search results

You have not followed this thread very well have you? If the church did not hold that why did not one catholic correct the person who claimed it did?

You do? lol. If they used the word as final authority they would hold to sola scripture they don’t, because the word is not their final authority Thanks though, I needed a good laugh

When are you or anyone ever going to tell why Jesus would have been effected if Mary had normal sexual relations with her husband?

if you did you would not believe the way you do, it’s why most anti Catholics are no longer catholic yep, they are but if they are wrong they take you and everyone else with them again, if your leaders were so infallible, their beliefs would line up with the word, and they would not need all...

Typical false line of reasoning you think because the men you fallow tell you they are infallible they are? if they were their doctrines would not be so easily destroyed by scripture

It’s obvious you do not listen to a thing people say your argument is a trained one, one taught you by your leaders and teachers, one used to get you to mock us, because that’s all you ever do. I actually feel sorrow for you

It’s actually quite simple, God did not leave us alone or with no means, he would not tell us to test, if we were unable if my belief causes the word to contradict. My belief is in error. That’s one of the largest reasons I can not see it your way, your way has the word contradict itself in so...

Then John was wrong because he told us we can know we have eternal life you claim we can’t that alone should set you to pause in what you believe

The authority given to the church would be bound by scripture it’s funny you use scripture to try to prove your point then deny scripture is the source if a calvinist and baptisT (who both believe in the same gospel by the way) argue about who is right. Then they go to the word. The Catholic...

What council in Jesus day determined which scrolls (books) belonged in the torah? how could they know which books were inspired and which were not, using your own reasoning?

Amen if it prety clear what Jesus is talking about do not seek food which perishes but food which endures to eternal life which he will give they promote a food which perishes, hence why they have to continue to eat, this alone proves the Eucharist is teaching are not supported by John 6. But...

Like you appear to be doing?

Jesus told them why They did not believe (in him) they were looking for free food, a handout, not the truth. pits amazing how you skip half the passage yet yell at those who have actually studied the passage as if they are clueless

Amen, John 6 is a stumbling block to catholic and other Eucharistic churches. Sadly, like these disciples it is what Jesus said, you can not see because you do not believe, and one of you is the devil jesus spoke that way to weed out the true believers, not institute some pagan ritual that...

Amen, the flood answers everything it’s odd, peter warned us of these days where people forget the flood. 2 peter 3: knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, 4 and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers...

He did not the confusion comes from science trying to Determin when they got there and how old yet they do it by wanting to take God out, the answer is easy, the flood. All,fossils were formed by the flood. Not millions of years of evolution

Moses uses a typical hebrew writing form he gives a basic account (Gen 1) Then he gives a deeper more detailed account (Gen 2) It’s really no different than dan 2 vs daniel 7. Where the archangel gives a basic amount of the future gentile kingdoms is 2 then a more tailed account in seven, then...

So many people use this verse, where peter is explaining what time is like to God compared to us. Where he says a day is LIKE.. he did not say a day was. people need to stop taking peter out of context to support their belief system

Confusion comes when you make the time between evening and morning more than 24 hours, it means the rotation of the earth was minimal, it means there would be little to no gravity. As for age of anything, we can not properly use science to age anything past the flood. Because no one was alive...

You listen to men I use the word as god commanded and let god speak to me why you can not see it is beyond me. You base your whole eternity on the fact men got it right you will not even test what they say as god commanded you blindly follow them