Search results

Yes. Except for all the action necessary there is no action necessary.

LOL. Our feminized man-hating society wants to pretend there is no difference between masculine and feminine, except to claim masculinity is inherently toxic. You don't find that labeling? The masculine called things by their proper name. He gave life and light. He gave His only begotten Son to...

No. Reading comprehension. "Saved" is the past tense action word, aka work. The internal work needed is to accept the salvation offered. This is not insignificant or trivial and if it were universalism would be correct doctrine. Speaking in contradictions does not attract the lost.

It's so funny how you deny action while using action words. Receiving is an action. It is complete nonsense by all the Christians in the history of the world to deny the work one must do to be saved, not external, which is the use of the term in the Bible. It is internal work of...

We are corporeal and temporal beings who do not exist in eternity.

No. I am recognizing the difference in the Bible from our society of the meaning of work. We are not saved by external works so no man may brag as the Bible says. But it takes internal work, transformation and action to be saved. The action is accepting. Accepting is an action word. We must...

Sad but predictable attempt to artificially construct dogma from text it does not contain. If you want to take things out of context, a sliver of text here and there, you can reconstruct any doctrine you want. Point is the trinity is not in the Bible, period. There is not one verse that states...

God raised Jesus. Acts 17:31. Do you know the difference between being a passive, lifeless object (Jesus) from the one DOING THE ACTION (God)?

There is only one God, not 2 or 3, as Jesus himself says in Mark 12.

No. That is simply not true. Why Isaiah 7:14 Is Not A Prophecy of Jesus’ Virgin Birth

Wrong. The pertinent question is not what words anyone says but do they actually do the will of God.

Of course! The OT is filled with God's wrath for prolonged disobedience. But your question is besides the point of this thread, the masculine side of Jesus. Do you think it is not feminine to criticize?

I am not questioning baptizing with water but in whose name one is to be baptized. The rebellious Apostles indicate in the name of Jesus alone.

No. We are comparing your ex post facto rationalization to the fallacy of argumentation known as Circular Reasoning.

John 17:3 Jesus is not God.

Reading comprehension. Figurative speech.

Ad Hominem means you lost.

Words are WHAT not Who. The Word of God was put in the prophets mouth. This does not equal God incarnate.

Not this again. The Word is not Jesus. See Deutoronomy 18:15-18

Circular Reasoning. You do love that fallacy ... An undefeated sports team cannot lose. If the lose, they weren’t undefeated to begin with.