Search results

I read what the word says have you? do us all a,favor, can you actually discuss scripture instead of just telling everyone who wrong they are? did Jacob not fear that his brother would kill him because he tricked him into giving something, which is being decieptfull. Or let me guess you do not...

That’s your problem That’s why you excuse your sin as not sin, you think your ok, because you do not commit certain other sins

That’s your opinion, that’s all

So your equating esau trying to repent or change his mind about selling his birthright to Jacob as him repenting of his sin? Wow man, I mean wow

Sin is sin is sin Jacob did not serve his brother when he sinned against him, you deny it was sin has no bearing because again, sin is sin stop excusing it

Your right, and how are we cleansed and made pure? Again, how are we washed and made pure?

John 3: 18 “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light...

Not in scripture? Lol you really do not know about how jacob sinned against esau and how even Jacob came and repented to esau? Begging to find favor in his sight, because he knew he had committed sins against Jacob

Ok are we talking about esau the child or edom, the nation of israel and can you post the post where it says he repented and God refused?

Well if there is the Roman church and the Protestant church and those both condoned slaughter what is left?

My bible says those who are in unbelief are condemned already. Jesus never said they were not condemned, then condemned again. He said they were condemned already John said that those who depart the church as antichrists (those who reject Christ) were never of the church. So how could they have...

is this true? Is Esau in hell? if so, where does it say this? Remember, it was Jacob who sinned against Esau. not the other way around.

Also. If it can be used to condemn the catholic church, It can be used to condemn the protestant church also. So see why this line of reasoning is also not very productive when trying to persuade someone to leave the catholic church

but do the people need to be condemned because of what the church did? Can you see my problem with your line of thinking?

ok, then how could they have repented multiple times? You said it as if they could do it. That was my question was it not?

Yes, And I asked why the protestant church who did the same should not be condemned also. did I not? And this is in your view the truth. All church makes mistakes. so shoud all churches be condemned?

feel free I asked you twice now to explain how I misunderstood you You said many have never repented OTHERS. can repent all they want by saying others. How can I get that to mean anything other than these people are NOT of those who never repented. And can you explain how they could ever...

yet I am the one who bears false wtness

this is like someone having video where he is caught throwing a rock in a window. and after he is shown the video of his throwing the rock. He still deny's he threw the rock and broke the window

lol I asked for an explanation numerous times man, do I have to prove that too? wow. Just wow!