Search results

First Jesus? What a wild speculation.

Not a single verse of Scripture quoted here. Interesting!

This guy appears to have embraced the false doctrine promoted by Thomas Ice, who attempts to redefine the Greek word apostasia as the physical removal of the Church to heaven rather than the falling away from the faith within the professing Church. This is a classic example of forcing Scripture...

One crown? Ahem! Read Revelation 19 again.

Sigh... :rolleyes: Totally ridiculous. Apparently, 2,000 years haven’t been enough. You’re STILL scanning Jerusalem for physical events to prop up your doctrine. Perhaps the next headline will finally supply what your interpretation is missing.

LOL! Telling us to simply accept what Scripture says is rich of you when you couldn't explain why God is mad at trees and fruits.

This has nothing to do with Matthew 11. You have misapplied Scripture and confused yourself.

Incorrect. Read here.

Within the God's congregation, there are two groups: the elect and those whose Christianity is merely a profession. The former discern spiritual truth and bear faithful witness; the latter approach spiritual things with a carnal understanding. Your insistence on a strictly geographical...

Sigh, you don't "understand" what the Lord talks about. You do not even know what generation the Lord talked about. Clearly! Here is a biblical lesson for anyone with ear to hear on who is actual responsible for the blood of ALL Saints, including the heathens: Revelation 17:5 "And upon her...

Y LOL. You believe a physical city in the Middle East is responsible for “all that were slain upon the earth” (Revelation 18:24)—including Abel, who was murdered before that city even existed? :Laughingoutloud: That is quite a claim! Now explain from Scripture how your interpretation...

False. Clearly you and Earburner did not read Scripture carefully. Jesus identified John the Baptist as the “Elijah” promised in Malachi 4:5. This means John fulfilled Elijah’s prophetic role, rather than being Elijah "physically returned." Malachi foretold: “Behold, I will send you Elijah...

I will jump in here and answer the questions. The Two Witnesses are the faithful witnesses of the New Testament congregation (Elects) with power to preach Salvation Gospel, as well as judgments as often as they like: No, the faithful testimony started at Pentecost until the judgment of the...

“Many proofs,” yet apparently none made it into your post. How convenient. :rolleyes: Present the chapters and verses, explain their context, and demonstrate from Scripture why Babylon must mean Jerusalem. Saying “no doubt about this” tells us how confident you are; it does nothing to...

Oh brother... you are answering a question I never asked. I did not ask whether we should use common sense or whether interpretations should make sense. I asked you to support your specific claim that comparing Scripture with Scripture applies to doctrine but excludes prophetic fulfillment...

:watching and waiting:

No, physical city Jerusalem was never Babylon. Show us chapter and verse to prove this. The conclusions I am seeing everywhere coming out of your mouth is that you are wrong with your assumption. You have not yet offer a single verse to support your claim.

Is the even surrounding 70AD the worst ever witnessed on Earth anytime in history? Really?

No. I acknowledge that fulfillment occurs in actual events. I do not agree that those events become the authority for interpreting prophecy. Those are two different claims. Scripture establishes what a prophecy means and what qualifies as its fulfillment. We then evaluate what we observe...

LOL! Failed WHAT test? Your own man-made test based on a rule you cannot even establish from Scripture? Clearly you did not read my post carefully or listen to it. Typical! You are still confusing two entirely different things: interpreting prophecy and observing events that may correspond...