Search results

I just want to fix some errors I have spread to people in this thread (repentance)... I am now a Sedevacantist and have my reasons. I believe that there is a high chance that the SSPX, SSPV, FSSP, Novus Ordo, and any other Church that is found in a typical Church building and identifies as...

Popes have been burned at the stake for heresy in the Catholic Church. There have been a decent number of Antipopes in our past. Something like this is not so new. But the Church has fallen to an all new low.

I do not agree with Sedevacanism. I'm not really sure which group I should go to. I agree a lot with the SSPX, but Pope Pius X believed that people should read the Bible. Traditionally, only the Bishops and Priests had access to the Bible and Catechism. So I question why they think this way, and...

It was prophesied that Satan would eventually overthrow the seat of Rome and that the Church would fall. It was also prophesied that the Church would be resurrected during the beginning period of the End Times. I believe we are on the cusp of the 5th and 6th age with the 6th age being the End...

Have you ever considered that they are correct? What is your reasoning for saying that they are in the wrong?

They are not real jews. Nor are they semetic. How come you have nothing to say about post#92?

I think that in order for someone to be culpable of the sin, in your later statement, they have to have read that or been told before so. Plus, say that one had learned that Christ is the Son of God in the past and later forgotten...then speculated on this matter...or even accidentally taught...

I'm not sure who would teach something that they seriously thought was incorrect. But, yes, if someone teaches something that is flawed then it would be heresy. Whether or not they are culpable for the sin is a whole new ball game. Its all about culpability.

How do you figure? The way I see it is this... One may speculate a heresy but in order to be culpable for it they have to have been shown that they are in the wrong first. Otherwise, speculating a heresy does not mean they should be punished for it.

It may be heresy but you are not necessarily culpable for it. Might you agree?

I am getting a different translation for Ephesians 5:25, 26. I use the Douay-Rheims 1899 version. But I think when it says the "Word" that the Word is Jesus Christ (John 1:1). I am not seeing how this verse is metaphorical. Of course, I do believe John 3:5 is talking about Baptism (a...

Please refer to next post. Ignore this one.

Plus the person has to be corrected. If he/she persists in error after the fact then they would be guilty of heresy.

It says in scripture that a woman should cover her head in submission to her husband. If its in the Bible it is doctrine. Before Vatican II, you could walk into a Catholic Church and witness many women wearing head covers.

Heresy is a teaching that is against what was traditionally taught. To say that it is unimportant/unnecessary for a woman to wear a cover on her head at mass is heresy since the scriptures say they should. Statistics that show that the Novus Ordo has been dishing out annulments and divorces at...

I'm sorry. I can't have a constructive debate with someone who does not answer any of my questions.

You mean all of the believer talk?

Thanks

Thank You. I feel like I have to explain why it is I believe the way that I do. Traditionally, the Catholic Church did not open up about Theology because the higher ups believed that very few people make it to Heaven and that if people were to know the Truth that the vast majority of them would...

Why do you say that Romans 10 is representative of the whole Gospel?