Search results

What Old Testament reference is Paul using to make this statement in Hebrews? But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. — Hebrews 1:8 Post #501

These trinity guys are always trying to say "see here's proof" off of a verse. I can only assume I’m one of these guys? Could you direct me to where I’ve proclaimed this, and also explain to me what else I believe?

This is the question I’d asked @Wrangler in an earlier post, which he never responded to. Where did I make a positional statement as to the topic is Jesus God. It was simply a question. The reason I had asked Peter if he’d considered joining your group is because at times he also appears to...

Well, thanks for not admonishing me this time. Maybe your not fit to be a JW, after all.

It was a simple question.. I wasn’t making a statement! Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre. Thou lovest righteousness, and hatest wickedness: therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows. — Psalm 45:6-7...

What Old Testament reference is Paul using to make this statement in Hebrews? But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. — Hebrews 1:8

I believe I understand now, what I posted didn’t come directly from you men teachers, and I understand that is important too you! Try and understand that it means nothing too me.

Which part did I lie about, that Eliezer of Damascus was the first servant in father Abraham’s house or that the Hebrew word for Lazarus is Eliezer? Or was it that the rich man was arrayed in fine linen? Did it bother you that I said that Jesus was rich toward God?

Maybe since Eliezer/ Lazarus of Damascus was the first servant in father Abraham’s house, the story is about Jesus’s spiritual state? I also note that Jesus was also arrayed in purple and fine linen - rich toward God.

According to my understanding the bosom of God would be a place of eternal rest. The bosom of Abraham according to Jewish understanding I would guess would be a place awaiting the rest of God.

It’s almost laughable, Lazarus was also in the bosom of Father Abraham. I guess by his theological stance Lazarus would also be God?

Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. — Luke 24:39

It could simply be stating the creation that begins in the first century. With the birth of Jesus, Gods firstborn Son.

God was also manifest in Paul’s flesh. I’ve often considered this, seeing God has no beginning nor end.

I’m just reading scripture.

Have a look at this also. It appears that even upon Jesus’ arrival in heaven that God is still revealing things to him? The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his...

So much for what Peter understood at this time. But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father. — Mark 13:32

How so, it was the Spirit of God in Jesus were in He manifested Himself? If we are of that same Spirit should we not manifest the same that Christ did?

I probably would have stated the same.

Absolutely! Jesus is the image of the invisible God- just as a mature Christian should be today. I should be able to view the life of a Christian and see the Father.