The Bible code is very interesting, but unlike gemetrias, the likelihood of a message in it rests in statistical chance. (Gemetrias are numerical values based on the text that relates to the passage in question and are easily demonstrated). And the statistical chance of the codes is what they (meaning mathematicians) are debating about.I tend to believe there are codes, only because mathematical heavyweights like Eliyahu Rips claims it is so by precisely defining rules and boundaries that the code can appear in (I forget what they are again, and the reasoning he used). So, for the critics that claim that "War and Peace" also have codes because it is statistically possible, Rips claims that they went out of the boundaries and map out the entire book, or a large section of it. The tightened boundaries, he claims, are statistically small to happen by chance. So, when someone claims the codes say that Jesus is the devil or something like that, they probably went outside the rules. That being said, statistics is very funny, and something this complex needs computers. For example, if you have a class of 24 people, the odds that two people have the same birthday is good. This defies commonsense when we all know there's 365 days to a year, and likewise the critics of the code claim there's more chance than meets the eyes.So, one has to decide if the chance is that great, even with Eliyahu Rips' tightened boundaries and rules.