True. Real science supposed to be observable and testable.
Theory of evolution (TOE) is neither.
It is known as a theoretical science which operates on a much lower standard of evidence which is based on speculation and assumption. It's closer to philosophy than science.
Microevolution happens.
Mutations happen.
Natural selection also happens with factors such as weather or food supply.
Those moths changed colour over time because the trees changed colour over time, that's not evolution that's natural selection.
But macroevolution never happens.
A species of animal doesn't come from another species of animal. It's never been observed and not even genetic engineering can acheive it
When you ask an evolutionist how life began many will simply say that not their field of science, that belongs to abiogenesis.
In any case, theoretic materialist science says that all life came from one single cell known as the universal common ancestor.
Problem is that a cell can only replicate itself. A lions skin cell can only replicate a lions skin cell, it cannot replicate a human heart cell.
Darwin admitted this. But take a fossil such as Lucy. A bunch of bones scattered over a large area. So it's an assumption that it came from one individual. It's less than 50% of a complete skeleton, has no feet bones so it's an assumption that it was a biped. It had no skull so it's an assumption it had a human-like skull. And it's hip was modified to make it look human.
And they point to that as being a transitional fossil between ape and human when it's all based on assumption. If it's actually from one individual in the first place it is just another ape.
A fossil called Archaeopteryx was thought to be a missing link that showed reptiles evolving into birds but it's just an extinct animal. Later they would find that birds were already around before then.
They've also fraudently made fossils. Piltdown man was the best evidence they had for humans coming from apes. It held firm for almost 50 years before it was discovered that they had put a humans skull onto an apes jaw.
That's also true. Everything deteriorates.
Cells are constantly deteriorating. That's why they have to duplicate so often. A mutation of nearly always a deleterious one. It cannot produce an animal of a different kind. It runs contrary to the laws of thermodynamics.
True. Different colur hair, skin, eyes in humans are types of mutations but a human is still a human.
Humans have been breeding animals such as dogs and farm animals for thousands of years. We see different breeds but a dog is still a dog, it has never evolved into anything else, they can all still breed with eachother despite being different breeds.
Exactly. How does a single cell evolve into different cells and then different systems and then arrange themselves into different animals. It's nothing more than speculation and wishful thinking
Information doesn't form randomly. You can just randomly put letters together and expect to form coherent words. It would just be an illiterate mess. Only an intelligent designer can put down this code and information in our DNA that is required for life.
True. Sometimes they'll say that because animals or genes have similar parts that us evidence for evolution. Again it's nothing more then speculation and wishful thinking.
A Hilux has similar parts to a Land Cruiser, sometimes identical parts. That doesn't mean one evolved from another, it just means its creator, Toyota, used the same parts for two different vehicles.
I enjoyed threading this
@Jericho
If you wrote this then your a genius but even if you copy and paste it your a smart person.
Praise does not go to processes that are blind, random and materialistic as TOE says
Praise goes to God
